Apparently a lot! I\'m under 35 and own 6 film cameras of different sorts. And those are just the cameras that work ;-). Just go on facebook and see all the younger people picking up film cameras in favor of all the people shooting digitally and making it look like film. That\'s the funny part, most of the film shots I see now look modern while so many shooting digital in the market are trying to make it look like old film. Digital is definitely thundering away and the driving force of all things photographic but despite that fact, film is still being used enough to profit off. I just never understood why anyone would want to see any medium fail. Even routing failure on just doesn\'t make sense to me as an artist or business person. That\'s like going to an art store and having the option of watercolor only. I\'d rather go there and see watercolor, acrylic, oil, gouache, pastels, pencil, etc. Sure there\'s photoshop, but a watercolor that\'s just been globbed on the paper thicker is still a watercolor ;-)
Micky Bill wrote:
Seriously, what person under 35 who isn\'t a \'hobbiest\' even owns a film camera.
Feb 09, 2012 at 05:24 PM
Previous versions of cineski's message #10329022 « Kodak to continue making film! »
