Tyl3n0L wrote:
Yes it\'s sure one hell of a monster at 36mp, but that\'s about it isn\'t it? I don\'t really care about the video feature. I mean the D700 ISO seems to be quite a bit better and the D700 is also faster. Even my older D90 is 4.5fps... This is two specs I was mostly looking for, High ISO & Speed.
If you were comfortable with the cost of the D700 and FX lenses, you\'d be very comfortable with the cost of the D800. Your \"problem\" is that you\'re comparing apples and oranges, because the costs of DX and FX are nowhere near comparable. Neither are the various performance metrics.
Your next camera is likely the D400, but it might also be a used D700, D3, or D7000. This is a year when Nikon renews a whole bunch of things. There is no way the D800 is the likely successor or alternate to your D90... too big a difference in a lot of ways.
Feb 08, 2012 at 03:39 PM
Previous versions of Rodolfo Paiz's message #10324785 « Higher ISO D800 samples »
