coranda wrote: Lars Johnsson wrote: PhilDWedding wrote: stanj wrote:
As many as possible. I love the way Nikon split the lines - fast, high ISO D4 and slow, high MP D800E. If I can get 40MP I\'ll take them.
Even if they\'re terrible quality?
Megapixels, as stated so many times, is not the most relevant single figure which determines quality of image print.
Camera manufacturers did a Very Bad Thing by making everyone focus on one value which is not the be all and end all of image quality
Which is the the most relevant single figure which determines quality of image print according to you Just so we know
For most things in life, a single figure is not an adequate measure of anything.
There are, of course, some exceptions. For example, a mere binary figure can be an important measure of some things like: do I have a camera that can take good pictures, am I still alive, is my creativity really limited by my hardware or am I just not trying hard enough?
Don\'t get me wrong. I think the Nikon D800 sounds wonderful and, if I had 10 Nikon lenses I\'d probably be ordering one. But, as it is I have 10 Canon lenses, I\'ll just wait around and try improving my still limited photographic talent with the excellent gear that I already have.
I\'m glad that you are trying to improve your photographic talent. But that have nothing to do with the question I aksed Phil
Feb 08, 2012 at 08:01 AM
Previous versions of Lars Johnsson's message #10323267 « How many pixels do you want for 5D III »
Just so we know