No, you show me. I have edited my post above to provide a cite for my claim...you were the one who made the assertion that it\'s a myth. Debates don\'t work by you throwing out a claim and then when I ask for substantiation of the claim, you say \"go find it.\"
Look, if you need the resolution, go for it. I just find that in these forums SO many people are so obsessed with every single minute difference in theoretical image quality that they never think about whether the print or the image looks good. My basic assertion is that if you are printing 24\" or smaller, and you create a wonderful photograph with ANY modern DLSR or large sensor compact or mirroless camera...no one is going to look at the print and say \"hmm....not enough resolution...or \"wow, great shot, but there\'s only 10.5 stops of dynamic range.\" If it\'s a good photo, it\'s a good photo. If the photo is only \'good\' because it is super sharp and detailed, then it\'s not very good, IMO.
Feb 07, 2012 at 08:15 PM
Previous versions of Jman13's message #10321648 « D800, 36mp, af at F8, ect, press release out »
