A definite no for me, I wouldnt take 36mp even if they paid me to take it.
It would basically mean streamlining and/or upgrading my processing gear and workflow, which I have zero interest in doing.
The largest print I\'ve ever made was A3 from a panasonic LX3 and it got exhibited, won me a photocomp, got sold multiple times, has close to 300 favs on flickr () and generally nobody seems to give a pinch of his pocket lint about the fact that it was made from a smaller camera.
My only reason for upgrading has always been that some camera helps me take the photo in the first place, not because the actual photo is better.
Thats just me though, countless photographers (maybe the majority?) have different needs or wants. I expect this camera to make a killing in landscape photography for example.
Feb 07, 2012 at 06:33 PM
Previous versions of Spyro P.'s message #10321231 « Better rather than just more megapixels ? »
) and generally nobody seems to give a pinch of his pocket lint about the fact that it was made from a smaller camera.