fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
kakomu
's message
#10320694
« Judging the Race: Bodies vs Lenses »
kakomu
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Judging the Race: Bodies vs Lenses
RobDickinson wrote
:
17-40L has no nikon equive
Nikon has the 16-35 f/4 VR. It is quite a bit more expensive than the Canon 17-40 F/4 probably due to having VR. There\'s also the discontinued 18-358 f/3.5-4.5.
Feb 07, 2012 at 04:44 PM
kakomu
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Judging the Race: Bodies vs Lenses
RobDickinson wrote
:
17-40L has no nikon equive
Nikon has the 16-35 f/4, though it is quite a bit more expensive than the Canon 17-40 F/4.
Feb 07, 2012 at 04:41 PM
Previous versions of
kakomu
's message
#10320694
« Judging the Race: Bodies vs Lenses »