Ralph Conway wrote: bobbytan wrote:
The 82mm filter is another tell-tale sign i.e. they have to make the barrel a little fatter because of the IS mechanism.
Ralph Conway wrote:
YES. What else could it be?
Yes! They are cool. Presenting an image that hides the truth and surprising all of us by making it lighter, better and more comfortable (IS) too. How would they be able to ask for 50% price add on else?
I do not think they think their customers are stupid.
It will turn out as \"Outsch, we did a mistake, sorry. It is no 24-7ß 2.8 L II It is an 24-70 2.8 L IS of course!
Also it makes no sense that they would release a 24 prime with IS and the 24-70 with no IS. We will find out real soon ... maybe in a couple of days.
Feb 06, 2012 at 01:42 PM
Previous versions of bobbytan's message #10315504 « New lenses »
