ok guys, there you go.
I am not trying to proove anything here, this is just an impression I always had, that the 25 is far more contrasty than the 35.
I happen to have shot the exact image at 25 mm for comparison, with a black shadow on the bottom unfortunately.
here it is cropped to compare to the 35mm
and the 35 again.
I am now surprized how similar they are when the 25 is cropped. Part of the more contrasty look might be due to the different angle of view and smaller structures in the image. I still think the 25 has more intense colours. It might also vignette more.
what do you think? The 25 sure will have lost a bit due to cropping. or: after cropping it still looks as good as the 35.
John - you own them both as well, what would you say?
ok guys, there you go.
I am not trying to proove anything here, this is just an impression I always had, that the 25 is far more contrasty than the 35.
I happen to have shot the exact image at 25 mm for comparison, with a black shadow on the bottom unfortunately.
here it is cropped to compare to the 35mm
and the 35 again.
I am now surprized how similar they are when the 25 is cropped. Part of the more contrasty look might be due to the different angle of view and smaller structures in the image. I still think the 25 has more intense colours. It might also vignette more.
what do you think?
John - you own them both as well, what would you say?
Jan 23, 2012 at 10:46 AM
Previous versions of cyra's message #10272876 « ZE35/2.0 - Lack of magic at infinity »
