safcraft wrote:
I do not own or tested a NEX. I am also aware that the new C3 and 5N are a step ahead the Olympus MFT offerings.
BUT...my E-P2 with Leica glass is MILES away from my 5D+35L.
If using the E-P2 at ISO 1600 (usually needed in party\'s when i tend to get lazy and not take the 5D) the results are just lame. Too much noise on that tiny sensor. So my P2 is not a substitute. Its better than a P&S, but really far away from FF.
Wake me up when a mirrorless camera equals FF at High ISO.
5n is half a stop worse than my 5d2. I just shot a side by side test, and the 5d2 has slightly more detail, as expected..and it would be irrelevant until printing at 20x30 or larger. IMO.
Jan 22, 2012 at 01:43 PM
Previous versions of h00ligan's message #10270545 « Mirrorless craze - Am I missing something? »
