fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
h00ligan
's message
#10270175
« Mirrorless craze - Am I missing something? »
h00ligan
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Mirrorless craze - Am I missing something?
garydavidjones wrote
:
The EVIL pocket-size craze is counter-productive for much of photography.
Photography is still dependent upon the optics of big glass for optimal results.
For macro and other types of photos, you get better results with, for example,
a Canon 180 mm macro lens than some pancake lens. I have been seen
superior results with my Canon 70-200 mm IS II lens compared to what I got
with the Canon 24-105 mm. Quality is still dependent on optics and big glass.
So Leica lenses aren\'t the best in the world because they are small?
Jan 22, 2012 at 11:52 AM
Previous versions of
h00ligan
's message
#10270175
« Mirrorless craze - Am I missing something? »