LightShow wrote: carstenw wrote:
I was talking native lenses. The NEX lenses are monstrously large, considering the size of the bodies. RF lenses are of course tiny, but this is a completely different comparison.
But people seem to keep repeating \"APS-C of FF lenses have to be big\" they don\'t as RF glass proves.
Sure, if you can leave out the autofocus and electronic communication, then RF lenses are viable. Otherwise not. And this is my point: RF lenses are out there, are small, and are great, but not everyone wants to play alt. I having fun with alt on my primary system, a Nikon D3, with various Zeiss and Leica lenses, but my compact system I want to just work, which means AF and full communication.
Jan 22, 2012 at 04:29 AM
Previous versions of carstenw's message #10269476 « A Digital OM? »
