Chris Ventura wrote:
More MP\'s will not make your high end glass perform less, it will make it perform the same.
More MP\'s will not make diffraction set in at larger apertures, the diffraction was always there, you can now zoom in more to see it\'s effects easier.
More MP\'s will not make it harder to hand hold a camera and get great results. It will make it easier to see your camera shake if you choose to pixel peep a 36MP image at 1:1
More MP\'s will not increase noise. Noise might go up, but, so does resolution, again.. this is what you might get from viewing at 1:1 on screen. Try printing first, then bitch.
Everybody ought to read these points very carefully until they sink in.
Chris Ventura wrote:
Try printing first, then bitch.
Unfortunately, 99% of folks will do this in the reverse order, or perhaps not even make a print.
The only reason why I might like a D800 to be released with less than 36MP would be to see the bloody noses of everybody who spread those 36MP rumors, complained about it, wrote articles, posted polls etc.
Chris Ventura wrote:
More MP\'s will not make your high end glass perform less, it will make it perform the same.
More MP\'s will not make diffraction set in at larger apertures, the diffraction was always there, you can now zoom in more to see it\'s effects easier.
More MP\'s will not make it harder to hand hold a camera and get great results. It will make it easier to see your camera shake if you choose to pixel peep a 36MP image at 1:1
More MP\'s will not increase noise. Noise might go up, but, so does resolution, again.. this is what you might get from viewing at 1:1 on screen. Try printing first, then bitch.
Everybody ought to read these points very carefully until they sink in.
I love your thinking.
I\'m excited for the D800.
The video and MP haters can stick to using what they use now.
Chris Ventura wrote:
Try printing first, then bitch.
Unfortunately, 99% of folks will do this in the reverse order, or perhaps not even make a print.
The only reason why I might like a D800 to be released with less than 36MP would be to see the bloody noses of everybody who spread those 36MP rumors, complained about it, wrote articles, posted polls etc.
rbromfield wrote:
More MP\'s will not make your high end glass perform less, it will make it perform the same.
More MP\'s will not make diffraction set in at larger apertures, the diffraction was always there, you can now zoom in more to see it\'s effects easier.
More MP\'s will not make it harder to hand hold a camera and get great results. It will make it easier to see your camera shake if you choose to pixel peep a 36MP image at 1:1
More MP\'s will not increase noise. Noise might go up, but, so does resolution, again.. this is what you might get from viewing at 1:1 on screen. Try printing first, then bitch.
Everybody ought to read these points very carefully until they sink in.
I love your thinking.
I\'m excited for the D800.
The video and MP haters can stick to using what they use now.
rbromfield wrote:
Try printing first, then bitch.
Unfortunately, 99% of folks will do this in the reverse order, or perhaps not even make a print.
The only reason why I might like a D800 to be released with less than 36MP would be to see the bloody noses of everybody who spread those 36MP rumors, complained about it, wrote articles, posted polls etc.
Chris Ventura wrote:
Try printing first, then bitch.
Unfortunately, 99% of folks will do this in the reverse order, or perhaps not even make a print.
The only reason why I might like a D800 to be released with less than 36MP would be to see the bloody noses of everybody who spread those 36MP rumors, complained about it, wrote articles, posted polls etc.
Jan 14, 2012 at 03:21 PM
Previous versions of Thorsten's message #10247426 « Nikon D800 on February 7th... »
