AGeoJO wrote:
Scott, please note that two different cameras were used for those separate tests .
Good point. 14-24 was on the best Nikon, vs TS17 on the best Canon. This could change my view of TS-17 vs 14-24, but I don\'t think so because 16:9 website shows the Nikon 14-24 on a Canon doing signifcantly better than the 16-35 Canon on a Canon. But I will do some more checking to make sure that this is not what\'s causing the gap.
[ I just checked Tokina 16-28 2.8 on best Nikon vs best Canon and the variation was about 100, with Nikon being slightly better. The gaps mentioned above were more than 100, so this validates that the conclusion was appropriate]
AGeoJO wrote:
Scott, please note that two different cameras were used for those separate tests .
Good point. 14-24 was on the best Nikon, vs TS17 on the best Canon. This could change my view of TS-17 vs 14-24, but I don\'t think so because 16:9 website shows the Nikon 14-24 on a Canon doing signifcantly better than the 16-35 Canon on a Canon. But I will do some more checking to make sure that this is not what\'s causing the gap.
Nov 28, 2011 at 09:33 AM
Previous versions of Scott Stoness's message #10121449 « 16-35L, 14L, TS-17 or Nikkor 14-24 »
.