Dawei Ye wrote:
I could spend every day drinking nothing but water and eating only the very basic foods I require to continue living. I could probably save $200,000 over my lifetime. But I choose not to. I am happy to spend my money on better tasting food because it brings me more utility, happiness and well being, even if the it\'s discretionary, non financial wastage.
The same goes for the 85 f/1.2LII. I have photos that could not have been taken by a 85 f/1.8 lens without a substantial increase in noise or DOF or other qualitative aspect. To me, that is worth the additional cost.
Dawei Ye wrote:
I could spend every day drinking nothing but water and eating only the very basic foods I require to continue living. I could probably save $200,000 over my lifetime. But I choose not to. I am happy to spend my money on better tasting food because it brings me more utility, happiness and well being, even if the it\'s discretionary, non financial wastage.
The same goes for the 85 f/1.2LII. I have photos that could not have been taken by a 85 f/1.8 lens without a substantial increase in noise or DOF or other qualitative aspect. To me, that is worth the additional cost.
Nov 20, 2011 at 09:54 AM
Previous versions of Breitling65's message #10100677 « 85 f/1.2 L II = Not worth it. »
