PetKal wrote:
I\'ll give you an unprocessed image/example shot today for the application of heavy duty \"expose to the left\" strategy.
JPG SOOC, 50% crop and resize for web.....no pp other than that.
To my eye the exposure is more-or-less exactly where I wont it to be. And histogram is of no use to me, because I can still see the image with my own eyes on the LCD, and I can see the overexposure blink.
Noise in the background ? I do not care. If anything, I might make the background even darker in photoshop.
Very nice image!
I too might be inclined to darken the background (slightly), but the subjective aesthetics are very pleasing and I believe the exposure is very much \"spot on\" with regards to that (at least to my eyes, as viewed on my monitor).
PetKal wrote:
I\'ll give you an unprocessed image/example shot today for the application of heavy duty \"expose to the left\" strategy.
JPG SOOC, 50% crop and resize for web.....no pp other than that.
To my eye the exposure is more-or-less exactly where I wont it to be. And histogram is of no use to me, because I can still see the image with my own eyes on the LCD, and I can see the overexposure blink.
Noise in the background ? I do not care. If anything, I might make the background even darker in photoshop.
Very nice image!
I to might be inclined to darken the background (slightly), but the subjective aesthetics are very pleasing and I believe the exposure is very much \"spot on\" with regards to that (at least to my eyes, as viewed on my monitor).
PetKal wrote:
I\'ll give you an unprocessed image/example shot today for the application of heavy duty \"expose to the left\" strategy.
JPG SOOC, 50% crop and resize for web.....no pp other than that.
To my eye the exposure is more-or-less exactly where I wont it to be. And histogram is of no use to me, because I can still see the image with my own eyes on the LCD, and I can see the overexposure blink.
Noise in the background ? I do not care. If anything, I might make the background even darker in photoshop.
Very nice image!
The subjective aesthetics are very pleasing and I believe the exposure is \"spot on\" with regards to that (at least to my eyes, as viewed on my monitor).
Nov 07, 2011 at 01:30 PM
Previous versions of cameron12x's message #10065183 « Canon's native ISO »
