wickerprints wrote: wickerprints wrote:
I read the press release. It\'s clear to me. If it\'s not clear to you, then the only resolution of this fact is to wait and see what happens. I\'m not here to convince you. I\'m only stating what I believe to be true, and as further news rolls in, we will see. It\'s obvious you\'ve decided to believe what you want to believe, because you have your biases about what you think Canon should be doing in order to remain competitive in the pro DSLR market.
M Vers wrote:
Bias? Because I don\'t think a HIGHLY competitive company that holds a leading position in the market will surrender the top tier of that market that portrays bias? If you want to determine what you believe to be clear by simply guessing, basing that guess on a hunch, then that\'s fine. I just think it would be wiser to wait and see what Canon does before jumping to conclusions...
I think you just like to write things without reading what anyone else has to say, because I just WROTE \"WE WILL SEE\" TWICE in my previous response and yet you\'re accusing me of being the one to jump to conclusions. All I am going off of is what Canon itself has stated--that the 1D X represents the merging of the 1Ds and 1D lines--whereas you are going off of some hypothetical belief that someday in the future maybe Canon will add another model on top of the 1D X when there has been no indication of this.
So who is the one jumping to conclusions here? It sure as hell isn\'t me.
Actually, if you read correctly, it states the 1DX has replaced the 1DIV and the 1DsIII and the re-invention of the 1D and 1Ds lines NOT the merging 1D and 1Ds lines.
wickerprints wrote: wickerprints wrote:
I read the press release. It\'s clear to me. If it\'s not clear to you, then the only resolution of this fact is to wait and see what happens. I\'m not here to convince you. I\'m only stating what I believe to be true, and as further news rolls in, we will see. It\'s obvious you\'ve decided to believe what you want to believe, because you have your biases about what you think Canon should be doing in order to remain competitive in the pro DSLR market.
M Vers wrote:
Bias? Because I don\'t think a HIGHLY competitive company that holds a leading position in the market will surrender the top tier of that market that portrays bias? If you want to determine what you believe to be clear by simply guessing, basing that guess on a hunch, then that\'s fine. I just think it would be wiser to wait and see what Canon does before jumping to conclusions...
I think you just like to write things without reading what anyone else has to say, because I just WROTE \"WE WILL SEE\" TWICE in my previous response and yet you\'re accusing me of being the one to jump to conclusions. All I am going off of is what Canon itself has stated--that the 1D X represents the merging of the 1Ds and 1D lines--whereas you are going off of some hypothetical belief that someday in the future maybe Canon will add another model on top of the 1D X when there has been no indication of this.
So who is the one jumping to conclusions here? It sure as hell isn\'t me.
Actually, if you read correctly, it states the 1DX has replaced the 1DIV and the 1DsIII NOT the 1D and 1Ds lines.
wickerprints wrote: wickerprints wrote:
I read the press release. It\'s clear to me. If it\'s not clear to you, then the only resolution of this fact is to wait and see what happens. I\'m not here to convince you. I\'m only stating what I believe to be true, and as further news rolls in, we will see. It\'s obvious you\'ve decided to believe what you want to believe, because you have your biases about what you think Canon should be doing in order to remain competitive in the pro DSLR market.
M Vers wrote:
Bias? Because I don\'t think a HIGHLY competitive company that holds a leading position in the market will surrender the top tier of that market that portrays bias? If you want to determine what you believe to be clear by simply guessing, basing that guess on a hunch, then that\'s fine. I just think it would be wiser to wait and see what Canon does before jumping to conclusions...
I think you just like to write things without reading what anyone else has to say, because I just WROTE \"WE WILL SEE\" TWICE in my previous response and yet you\'re accusing me of being the one to jump to conclusions. All I am going off of is what Canon itself has stated--that the 1D X represents the merging of the 1Ds and 1D lines--whereas you are going off of some hypothetical belief that someday in the future maybe Canon will add another model on top of the 1D X when there has been no indication of this.
So who is the one jumping to conclusions here? It sure as hell isn\'t me.
Actually, if you read correctly, it states the 1DX has replaced the 1DIV and the 1DIII NOT the 1D and 1Ds lines.
wickerprints wrote: wickerprints wrote:
I read the press release. It\'s clear to me. If it\'s not clear to you, then the only resolution of this fact is to wait and see what happens. I\'m not here to convince you. I\'m only stating what I believe to be true, and as further news rolls in, we will see. It\'s obvious you\'ve decided to believe what you want to believe, because you have your biases about what you think Canon should be doing in order to remain competitive in the pro DSLR market.
M Vers wrote:
Bias? Because I don\'t think a HIGHLY competitive company that holds a leading position in the market will surrender the top tier of that market that portrays bias? If you want to determine what you believe to be clear by simply guessing, basing that guess on a hunch, then that\'s fine. I just think it would be wiser to wait and see what Canon does before jumping to conclusions...
I think you just like to write things without reading what anyone else has to say, because I just WROTE \"WE WILL SEE\" TWICE in my previous response and yet you\'re accusing me of being the one to jump to conclusions. All I am going off of is what Canon itself has stated--that the 1D X represents the merging of the 1Ds and 1D lines--whereas you are going off of some hypothetical belief that someday in the future maybe Canon will add another model on top of the 1D X when there has been no indication of this.
So who is the one jumping to conclusions here? It sure as hell isn\'t me.
Actually, if you read correctly, it states the 1DX has replaced the 1DV and the 1DIII NOT the 1D and 1Ds lines.
Oct 18, 2011 at 12:09 AM
Previous versions of M Vers's message #10006758 « EOS 1D-X! March 2012! »
