p150 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #8 · DJs Taking Photos at Receptions | |
openedeyes wrote:
My best friend is getting married later this year, and I've been going with her to all the bridal fairs to check out DJ's, and venues, and all that good stuff. Well, last month, one DJ was talking with her, and asked who her photographer was. She mentioned me, and he was all "Oh yeah, I've worked with them a ton, they're so awesome!" She smiled at him, and said, "Funny, she's not shooting her first wedding until next month."
Nice
has no clear understanding of "spreading out events." He made them do the toast, bouquet toss, garter toss (which the groom accidentally shot in the bride's face, fyi) first dance, etc. So. They still had 2 more hours of reception time, and this clown was done
While I'll admit he has no business setting the schedule and forcing his own timeline, I don't think "spreading out events" is necessarily the best way, either.
Many times, a couple chooses to have all of their events up front because:
- guests will leave and miss things
- time may be up with vendors
- they want to be able to spend time dancing or talking with family and guests without
interruption every 15 minutes
- they WANT the older folks (grandparents especially) to get to see the events then split so they don't have to watch drunken guests grinding on each other
- it allows the crowd who just wants to see the events do so and leave the party crowd to live it up all night. The alternative is: entrance, party a bit, first dance, party a bit, parent dances, party a bit, cake cut, party a bit, toasts, party a bit... which is disappointing to both crowds.
That's not to say that there's never a time where spreading things out may be the better choice, but I've seen so many people assume that's the way it should always be.
|