Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
p.73 #1Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
And a few from the Pen-F taken in nearby Pomfret, CT.
Regards,
Edd
Regards,
Edd
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Feb 27, 2021 at 06:28 PM
p.73 #2Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Pen-F + 12-40
Embalse Conde del Guadalhorce by Juan Amores, en Flickr
Embalse Conde del Guadalhorce by Juan Amores, en FlickrFeb 28, 2021 at 06:11 AM
p.73 #3Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Frozen Leaves by Adam Maas, on Flickr
E-M1.2, Micro-Nikkor 55mm f3.5 AI
Mar 03, 2021 at 06:15 PM
p.73 #5Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Within seconds of me taking this shot, the vole was swallowed alive.
Mar 07, 2021 at 10:29 PM
p.73 #6Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Imagemaster wrote:
Within seconds of me taking this shot, the vole was swallowed alive.
Nature can be so cruel
Great capture though
Within seconds of me taking this shot, the vole was swallowed alive.
Nature can be so cruel
Great capture though
Mar 08, 2021 at 07:27 AM
Mar 08, 2021 at 06:08 PM
p.73 #8Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Stepping back few weeks, likely the last snowfall in the area for this year.
Mar 08, 2021 at 08:47 PM
p.73 #9Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Mountain Bluebird. Oly High Res mode.
Mar 09, 2021 at 03:05 PM
p.73 #10Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Been a while ... some weekend fun.
|
||
 Kent Southers 2021 |
||
|
|
||
 Kent Southers 2021 |
||
|
|
||
 Kent Southers 2021 |
||
|
Mar 13, 2021 at 04:08 PM
|
p.73 #13Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
It's been a while since I took these shots, it was back in 2018 actually.
I decided to re-edit them for one major reason and that's DXO Photolab 4 and the, in my opinion, revolutionary noise reduction. These were shot at ISO 1000 so by no means near the limit of the E-M1 Mk II sensor anyway but DXO made a huge difference.
Also, by waiting two and a half years I looked at the shots way different and have changed my editing, all the sudden I am quite happy with the results where as before they looked way washed out, grainy and without the detail that I wanted. In hindsight, I should have shot them 1-1,5 stops darker which is what I have done in the edit. That could have given me better shutter speed at the same ISO, or just simply lower ISO. Live and learn, right?
E-M1 Mk II with Oly 40-150 Pro at F2.8
I decided to re-edit them for one major reason and that's DXO Photolab 4 and the, in my opinion, revolutionary noise reduction. These were shot at ISO 1000 so by no means near the limit of the E-M1 Mk II sensor anyway but DXO made a huge difference.
Also, by waiting two and a half years I looked at the shots way different and have changed my editing, all the sudden I am quite happy with the results where as before they looked way washed out, grainy and without the detail that I wanted. In hindsight, I should have shot them 1-1,5 stops darker which is what I have done in the edit. That could have given me better shutter speed at the same ISO, or just simply lower ISO. Live and learn, right?
E-M1 Mk II with Oly 40-150 Pro at F2.8
Mar 19, 2021 at 03:21 PM
p.73 #14Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Wilbus wrote:
It's been a while since I took these shots, it was back in 2018 actually.
I decided to re-edit them for one major reason and that's DXO Photolab 4 and the, in my opinion, revolutionary noise reduction. These were shot at ISO 1000 so by no means near the limit of the E-M1 Mk II sensor anyway but DXO made a huge difference.
Also, by waiting two and a half years I looked at the shots way different and have changed my editing, all the sudden I am quite happy with the results where as before they looked way washed...Show more →
Hey, those look good. Always great to have newer software that can improve old images.
I have not used DXO, but now use Topaz AI DeNoise and it makes a lot of improvement on some images, and not so much on others.
It's been a while since I took these shots, it was back in 2018 actually.
I decided to re-edit them for one major reason and that's DXO Photolab 4 and the, in my opinion, revolutionary noise reduction. These were shot at ISO 1000 so by no means near the limit of the E-M1 Mk II sensor anyway but DXO made a huge difference.
Also, by waiting two and a half years I looked at the shots way different and have changed my editing, all the sudden I am quite happy with the results where as before they looked way washed...Show more →
Hey, those look good. Always great to have newer software that can improve old images.
I have not used DXO, but now use Topaz AI DeNoise and it makes a lot of improvement on some images, and not so much on others.
Mar 19, 2021 at 08:42 PM
p.73 #15Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Imagemaster wrote:
Hey, those look good. Always great to have newer software that can improve old images.
I have not used DXO, but now use Topaz AI DeNoise and it makes a lot of improvement on some images, and not so much on others.
Yeah it is, specially software that makes such a big difference in many photos.
My brother also uses Topaz Denoise for is Fuji files as DXO doesn't support Fuji. He likes it a lot as well. It would seem that higher ISO shots fair far better in Topaz than they do in Lightroom or Capture One. I was impressed by Capture One compared to Lightroom when I started using it but none of them comes close to DXO in terms of reducing noise with very little loss in detail.
I know Topaz is really good as well and it works on all file types. DXO is limited to RAW images but I do find that, for my use and how I use it, DXO gives better results faster compared to Topaz.
Like you said, some shots benefit from it while other less so. And your shots are great as always.
/Rasmus
Hey, those look good. Always great to have newer software that can improve old images.
I have not used DXO, but now use Topaz AI DeNoise and it makes a lot of improvement on some images, and not so much on others.
Yeah it is, specially software that makes such a big difference in many photos.
My brother also uses Topaz Denoise for is Fuji files as DXO doesn't support Fuji. He likes it a lot as well. It would seem that higher ISO shots fair far better in Topaz than they do in Lightroom or Capture One. I was impressed by Capture One compared to Lightroom when I started using it but none of them comes close to DXO in terms of reducing noise with very little loss in detail.
I know Topaz is really good as well and it works on all file types. DXO is limited to RAW images but I do find that, for my use and how I use it, DXO gives better results faster compared to Topaz.
Like you said, some shots benefit from it while other less so. And your shots are great as always.
/Rasmus
Mar 20, 2021 at 03:50 PM
p.73 #17Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Taken a few years ago on our second visit to this fascinating area.
Wahweap Hoodoos
|
||
 |
||
|
Wahweap Hoodoos
Mar 23, 2021 at 06:22 AM
p.73 #18Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
An older shot taken in Canyonlands in 2014, one stop in a Southwest USA driving trip. Never processed before. I believe that this is a juniper, but open to correction.
As a form of self-amusement, I'm forcing myself out of my go-to workflow, and trying different tools or alternatively, the same tools in a different order. I generally start off in Lightroom Classic for RAW development, then quickly over to PS. With this image I started in On1 RAW 2021 and largely stayed there.
Brian
Juniper in Evening Light (Canyonlands) by Brian Gammon, on Flickr
As a form of self-amusement, I'm forcing myself out of my go-to workflow, and trying different tools or alternatively, the same tools in a different order. I generally start off in Lightroom Classic for RAW development, then quickly over to PS. With this image I started in On1 RAW 2021 and largely stayed there.
Brian
Juniper in Evening Light (Canyonlands) by Brian Gammon, on FlickrMar 23, 2021 at 03:49 PM
p.73 #19Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Mini Bergs by Adam Maas, on Flickr
E-M1.2, 12-40 Pro
Mar 24, 2021 at 07:55 PM
p.73 #20Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
It's been a while. Time to post some pics:
Untitled by fe_no_me_no, on Flickr
2021 Yale00020 by fe_no_me_no, on Flickr
PJTV6762Somerville84 by fe_no_me_no, on Flickr
Untitled by fe_no_me_no, on Flickr2021 Yale00020 by fe_no_me_no, on FlickrPJTV6762Somerville84 by fe_no_me_no, on FlickrMar 26, 2021 at 01:11 PM