I am sort of skipping to the bottom, here. So forgive me If I am repeating anyone (I might be echoing Kurtis a bit).
Apeture looks better. I straight up prefer the way that is is displaying compared to LR. The clone tool is very different than Photoshop, but I do prefer it to Lightroom's. The differences with hot keys, Full Screen and such are subtle, but I am still pleasantly suprised. I hated 1.2, back when I tried it.
This is sort of intriguing for me, I'll give the full 30 day trial and be using it for my next few sessions. Can't say that I am as turned off by it as other FM LR users seem to be.
TTLKurtis wrote:
Tom - if you compare the same thing with a couple images that have faces in them, you'll see that the Photoshop and Preview colors look more off than they do for a landscape sort of shot like this. Look at the bottom left in your picture and you'll see the only reddish tones in the image are different in PS/Preview than in LR/Aperture.
Here's one with people. Do you see the same difference? This is kind of fun.
Yep I've been using it for a couple of days and it seems to crash quite a bit. Looks like it eats memory and when you run out of RAM it then starts taking swap which causes the entire system to slow down and become unusable. Not good, lets hope 3.1 solves that!
Tony Hoffer wrote:
Yes. All I'd like to do is view a Full Screen version on my main monitor with the adjustments tab. Then I'd like a grid (browser) view on my second monitor. This seems impossible, but it saves me SOOO much time in LR...
Also, Aperture is way slower for me than LR. Importing and making adjustments seems to take forever.
it's not impossible. 2 ways to do it;
1) have the browser on the main monitor complete with adjustment tabs (if you can't see them press I) and the image full screen on the second monitor. I think this is exactly what you want
the way you do this is tell aperture to treat the 2nd monitor as 'alternate' and then press V a couple of times to just have the browser and nothing else on the main monitor. it kicks butt and is how I've been doing things for years - before LR could use a 2nd screen.
or
2) go completely full screen on both monitors. and use the floating 'H' hud. I think #1 is better for you.
As to speed, I don't know about your system but all the adjustments in aperture are realtime for me - it's a speed demon.
The only thing I wait on is when exporting raws out to versions as jpegs.
sejanus wrote:
it's not impossible. 2 ways to do it;
1) have the browser on the main monitor complete with adjustment tabs (if you can't see them press I) and the image full screen on the second monitor. I think this is exactly what you want
the way you do this is tell aperture to treat the 2nd monitor as 'alternate' and then press V a couple of times to just have the browser and nothing else on the main monitor. it kicks butt and is how I've been doing things for years - before LR could use a 2nd screen.
or
2) go completely full screen on both monitors. and use the floating 'H' hud. I think #1 is better for you.
As to speed, I don't know about your system but all the adjustments in aperture are realtime for me - it's a speed demon.
The only thing I wait on is when exporting raws out to versions as jpegs. ...Show more →
Just tried your method. That's not what I was looking for. I still can't get a full screen image beside the adjustment panel AND the browser (grid) on my other screen. I'm also noticing now that making multiple adjustments to photos seems more complicated and with fewer options than LR
Sounds like you haven't tried LR in a while though. You should give it a whirl. For editing only, I think it's a huge step up. For other things, I can see where Aperture has some value.
TTLKurtis wrote:
I hope you don't use the adjustment brushes and other local adjustments much, because you can't transfer that over.
This is the automated migration from Aperture 2. I never was a LR user. Can't even imagine how slow that would be! I had to copy the entire library to a bigger drive because it won't migrate it unless you have an equal amount of space free.
Tony Hoffer wrote:
Just tried your method. That's not what I was looking for. I still can't get a full screen image beside the adjustment panel AND the browser (grid) on my other screen. I'm also noticing now that making multiple adjustments to photos seems more complicated and with fewer options than LR
you are right, it's around the other way. this is the way I work though, I like it.
Sounds like you haven't tried LR in a while though. You should give it a whirl. For editing only, I think it's a huge step up. For other things, I can see where Aperture has some value.
I last tried it with version 2 - I hated it. Each to their own.
I don't find adjustments in aperture complicated, I think it works very smoothly.
Well, I picked up a tip in the Aperture Users forums to prevent the app from crashing so often. In the Preferences menu, make sure that Enable Faces is not checked. Some other people turned off the location feature as well, but Faces seemed to do the trick for me, now it works fast, and the adjustment brushes don't lag. I really don't have any use for the Faces feature, but it kind of sucks that I can't run the program with all of its features enabled.
On the other hand, there are four (4) album companies releasing plugins for Aperture. I just redesigned a whole album I had put together in InDesign, and it didn't take me more than a couple of hours to recreate the whole thing in Aperture. That alone makes the switch very compelling for me, not to mention the slick slideshows you can now put together from within Aperture.
