Well, so much for 640 pixels on the long side. I can't see the quality in the ZF 135 images I just posted. Someone advise me as to what size I should use.
For more images: www.facebook.com/pages/Martynas-Milkevi%C4%8Dius-Photo/315309251853942
Martynas, your images inspired me to re-buy some of the Zeiss lenses I sold. I still need to get my hand on the 21 2.8 again... Great work there Was the last one Petra?
Jim... those are stunning! Me and my wife will be in Maui in late May. Judging by your pictures we will definitely need to try to catch a sunrise on Haleakala
Jim, great pics from Maui - would love to see more details on the ground, have been cranking up levels in PhotoShop of your JPGs to see more
Not the createst art or technical shot but had to share my 2013 summer most important new photographic (if I would not photograph I would never purchased it) equipment I'll be using - hopefully it will help finding new perspectives and views (Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 1.4/35 @ f/1.4, 1/6s, ISO 100):
Thou I don't think I'll be using it any time soon - "Meanwhile in the lake" - Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100 @ f/11, 1/60s (vignetting slider touched in Apple Aperture)
Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 1.4/35 @ f/11, 1/40s, ISO 100
I am so out of touch these days. I knew nothing of her name. Thank you for the link. Interior is quite nice, especially the concrete and use of existing wood frame, indicative of Scandinavian good design.
the blood hound is with a ZE 35, the others with ZE 100. Had to resize for FM, and am not accustomed to optimizing for web, so definitely not as sharp as I am used to seeing them.
ZE 100 - handheld - (still unsure how/if sharpening would make a difference on downsized images), pointers appreciated on optimization...out of camera on these lenses, the sharpness amazes me.
Was the last one Petra?
