I still can't get over a ladder going into a river Great shots Luka...I'm not going to sit here and point out every single one like Philber though I do like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.........oh, and thanks for reminding me what I am missing out on without a ZF 21.....don't make me buy it!!!
rsolti13 wrote:
I still can't get over a ladder going into a river
Ah, but you see this is Sweden. Two thirds of the year that place looks like this:
So it's not just a ladder into the lake, but on to the ice.
charles.K wrote:
I have to agree with Ryan over the ladder in the river In Australia, we don't bother with the fancy ladders into the rivers. Great shots though Luka!
Well obviously not as you have to worry about crocodiles and killer koalas roaming the rivers!
rji2goleez wrote:
I still need to work more with the 100. Right now I feel more at ease with the 21.
You mean you find a lens that essentially requires no focusing to be easier to use than a macro lens that has a 360 degree focus throw? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you! Nice shot by the way.
Luka, that pretty much sums it up on the difference between the 21 and the 100. But I'm also 'feeling' like the 100 gives me 'dark' images. As if they're under exposed on occasion. It doesn't happen all the time which tells me it has to do with me, how I'm exposing the image and/or the particular composition. I haven't quite figured it out but I have a lot more playing to do anyway.
Time for me to contribute to the best thread in FM.
I have used my newly acquired Zeiss 50 MP mainly for cityscape panorama's. I will post a few when I process them. This is a 1 image shot (5 exposures blended manually).
ViscaB wrote:
Time for me to contribute to the best thread in FM.
I have used my newly acquired Zeiss 50 MP mainly for cityscape panorama's. I will post a few when I process them. This is a 1 image shot (5 exposures blended)
Great shots Luka...I'm not going to sit here and point out every single one like Philber 
.
