fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | General Gear-talk | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
  

Archive 2009 · Manfrotto ball heads: 488 versus 498

  
 
SteveTuerk
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Manfrotto ball heads: 488 versus 498


I'm finally retiring my Manfrotto heads - a 488R2 and a smaller version on my monopod. Both of them require a strong hand to get them tight enough to stay put, and then they droop down about a 1/4", no matter what. Needs a frictioner setup most badly too, as you turn that knob to loosen the head, and you keep turning, and suddenly bang, you'd BETTER have a hand under your lens!

I was initially sold on the locking mechanism in a store, and the fact that the plates were relatively cheap and had the ring that removes a need to find something to tighten them on cameras.

BUT, I've lived with the inevitable droop after setup and am tired of it. I used to think all ballheads did that but I tried out a Vanguard SBH300 and bought it cheap. I've got an RRS clamp on the way to install on it because I want everything standardized to the 38mm Arca Swiss size and think that with it's friction control I have a decent low cost solution (even with the RRS clamp costing $80.).

I put my 400mm onto my 5D2 and locked the Vanguard at a weird downward angle and focused on a small thing that was meant to see if it would hold. Two days later it hadn't budged. It took some fooling with it to find a balance between the friction and the lock but now I can set it so that I can move the camera and it'll stay wherever I let go of it.

Luxurious stuff!



May 07, 2010 at 07:18 PM
runamuck
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #2 · Manfrotto ball heads: 488 versus 498


One rule of ballheads: The bigger the balls, the better they work. Okay, I'll go home now.


May 07, 2010 at 07:34 PM
TomBrooklyn
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Manfrotto ball heads: 488 versus 498


I had heard mostly good things about the 488, and thought it was rather well regarded; although nobody was equating it with the likes of Arca Swiss, RSS, Kirk or other similar high end manufacturers.

So has the 498 alleviated the concerns of anybody who was disappointed with the 488?



Nov 27, 2010 at 07:29 AM
xcguy5
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Manfrotto ball heads: 488 versus 498


I know this is an old thread but I have three 488 RC2 and I have zero droop on any of them. OK OK, I don't have long telephoto lenses attached, just short zooms, but from the sound of some of the replies above droop is inevitable with the 488 RC2 and I've not experienced that at all. I also have a 498 RC4 and it doesn't droop either.


Mar 08, 2019 at 02:38 PM
1              end




FM Forums | General Gear-talk | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account