fredmiranda.com
Login
This topic is in the 2009 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.

Archive 2009Contax N Image Thread

  
 
mMontag
Offline
Details
p.15 #1Contax N Image Thread
MWP,

You may already be aware of these - they are a little high ($200-300) for that lens but there are fewer available every day - two have sold on Ebay over the last few months - $1,350.00 & $1,450.00 usd - I looked for one for about 4-6 months. There were only about 1,500 produced - people are holding on to them to have converted someday or to continue using them for "N" film.

Post a WTB on Conurus and B&S and maybe over at Rangefinder Forum

http://cgi.ebay.com/Contax-N-1-1-4-85-mm-Planar-T-/350365362548?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item5193672974

http://cgi.ebay.com/Contax-N-1-1-4-85-mm-Planar-T-/350365362548?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item5193672974
Jun 13, 2010 at 12:22 PM
AhamB
Offline
Details
p.15 #2Contax N Image Thread
@mMontag: read how many lenses (and camera bodies) are offered in that ad for 1800 euros and then adjust your opinion on the price.
Jun 13, 2010 at 01:09 PM
mMontag
Offline
Details
p.15 #3Contax N Image Thread
AhamB,

I'm not aware of the seller or the auction entity - if it is legitimate - it's probably the best deal in town!

Go for it - you could sell one lens & have the rest for free!
Jun 13, 2010 at 01:13 PM
aalfoldi
Offline
Details
p.15 #4Contax N Image Thread
This ad can be found on numerous ad sites in different countries for ages. It seems nobody goes for this best deal.
Jun 13, 2010 at 02:03 PM
ManWearPants
Offline
Details
p.15 #5Contax N Image Thread
I would buy them all if it is legitimate but alas, I cannot understand a single word on that ad. So better be safe than sorry. I mean the N400 is already worth more than EU1.8k. How real can that be? Maybe someone can sound them out. Would be good to warn people off if it is really a scam.

mMontag: I am aware of the price of N85+conversion which is why I still have not got one. BTW, the discussion on filters has moved here
Jun 13, 2010 at 02:44 PM
LightShow
Offline
Details
p.15 #6Contax N Image Thread
Sigh, looks like I may have N fever, there are lot's of amazing shots in this thread, keep on posting everyone.
Jun 16, 2010 at 06:15 PM
teh_rebel
Offline
Details
Jun 16, 2010 at 10:58 PM
Jim Schemel
Offline
Details
p.15 #8Contax N Image Thread
Paul,
Nice capture of the sun rays ^^^^^
-Jim
Jun 17, 2010 at 03:32 PM
Paul Yi
Offline
Details
p.15 #9Contax N Image Thread
Thanks....
I couldn't resist it....I was on the way to work...
Jun 17, 2010 at 04:10 PM
teh_rebel
Offline
Details
p.15 #10Contax N Image Thread
Paul, that was shot at F8
Jun 17, 2010 at 08:17 PM
mMontag
Offline
Details
p.15 #11Contax N Image Thread
teh_rebel,

There have been a few complaints on the 24-85 - looking at your last image I see nothing to complain about - I have one on the clock at Conurus. It has that lively brighter feel of the 35-70.
Jun 17, 2010 at 11:07 PM
teh_rebel
Offline
Details
p.15 #12Contax N Image Thread
mMontag, thanks. no complaints here ... yet lol. i just got mines back last week so ive only taken it out on one occasion so we'll see how it goes as i use it more
Jun 18, 2010 at 05:10 AM
mMontag
Offline
Details
p.15 #13Contax N Image Thread
Andi,

What's all the fuss with the negativity on the Zeiss 50/1.4. The MFD and bokeh on that last one sure looks good to me - might have something to do with the touch from the photographer. Nice shot!
Jun 28, 2010 at 09:22 PM
crazeazn
Offline
Details
p.15 #14Contax N Image Thread
what are the must have converted N mounts?
Jun 29, 2010 at 12:58 AM
philber
Offline
Details
p.15 #15Contax N Image Thread
Wonderful set, mMontag!
Jun 29, 2010 at 01:23 AM
AhamB
Offline
Details
p.15 #16Contax N Image Thread
crazeazn wrote:
what are the must have converted N mounts?


All of them.
Jun 29, 2010 at 01:55 AM
Jacob D
Offline
Details
p.15 #17Contax N Image Thread
maybe an irrelevant question for most but... how does the MF feel on the N lenses compare with C/Y or Z_ lenses? Is it a nice damped, smooth action or more like a Canon lens, plasticky loose feeling? (or somewhere between?)


Thanks...
Jun 29, 2010 at 09:42 AM
wayne seltzer
Offline
Details
p.15 #18Contax N Image Thread
mMontag wrote:
Andi,

What's all the fuss with the negativity on the Zeiss 50/1.4. The MFD and bokeh on that last one sure looks good to me - might have something to do with the touch from the photographer. Nice shot!


mMontag,

Since that shot is taken so close the bokeh is going to be super smooth and not a problem. Most of the time the bokeh is nice with this lens but if presented with more difficult bokeh situations like back-lit tree leaves in a relatively close background, then it can struggle some.
Its sharpness performance at MFD wide open is still very decent, just doesn't compare to some other zeiss lenses which are more optimized for that type of shooting, N 85/1.4, 50/2 MP, 100/2 MP, C/Y 35/1.4.
N 50/1.4 is a great walkaround 50mm lens and Andi makes it shine.
Jun 29, 2010 at 01:07 PM
Anden
Offline
Details
p.15 #19Contax N Image Thread
Jun 29, 2010 at 02:01 PM
Jacob D
Offline
Details
p.15 #20Contax N Image Thread
Andi Dietrich wrote:
At first it is odd because the lens doesnt translate the manual focusing directly into lens helicolid movement, this allows to have more precision, similar to the Contax and Z lenses.



Thanks Andi, but what do you mean specifically by the part I quoted above? Are these lenses "focus by wire" like the 85L?
Jun 29, 2010 at 08:31 PM
FM ForumsLeica & Alternative GearJoin Upload & Sell
  
 

You are not logged inLog inRegister