A friend bought my husband and I matching camera straps for Christmas. We now have 6 straps + the 2 canon straps. If only the family would give us cameras to use all these straps with
I forgot to mention that my husband, in a fit of frustration, bought me a jawbone earpiece. Apparently the motorola one just wasn't good enough (Seriously - no one could ever hear me when I talked on that one). I just tried it out today and it's been fantastic - I may never need to keep my ear glued to the phone ever again.
My GF got me snugg leather gloves for me to shoot outside in Chicago. And one of those planner/folder/calculator/notepad thingys for me to take on business meetings. Oh and she did knit me a scarf too!
KAJed wrote:
I've only had a little bit of time to play with it so far but I do like it. I do find that it seems to have issues with proper when my XSi is set to Av... Tv doesn't seem to have the same issue. I mostly shot the whole day on Manual for best results (bouncing most of the time anyways)
I own two ef500's and found you need to set the fec to +1ev to get proper exposure. It also goes by whatever object you meter from-- if you use a white object the rest of the photo will be underexposed; use a black object and it overexposes.. this is true for manual as well as Av.
DB wrote:
Mamiya RB 67 +127mm lens. It has a Pro-S back for 120 film. I have only one roll of film, so I need to try it out! I'm not sure if it will take a digital back (I'm thinking Yes), but I'm looking forward to investing in Polaroid ;-) Can't wait to use it! I think the light meter cost more than the camera. It was a great deal...
The RB67Pro-SD and the RB67Pro-S will both accept the Mam ZD back. However, I've shot with the ZD back and have returned to film. Usually when I'm shooting MF I'm not shooting a extremely large number of images (much time of the time in the studio or in a controlled setting), so the incremental cost in film isn't bad (compared to a 7k back), and I prefer a scanned transparency to the digital file.
