pascal03 wrote:
Rangefinders definitely have their charm... it sure does enhance the whole experience... just wish they weren't so darn expensive.
As compared to full auto exposure - ultra fast autofocus - big bulky camera's you could drive a nail in with - I would take a reasonably priced (sub $1000) rangefinder any day.
I'm interested in possibly getting a RF in the future but, I've been realizing more and more how expensive these things are! It's kind of ridiculous when you think about it. They're basically a box that a lens attaches to. Overall, they are very low tech compared to modern SLR's, it's crazy to me. But, on the other hand I like the idea of the more involved and intimate experience with taking photos.
They are only low-tech in the electronics department. A Leica M has way more moving parts than a typical Canon DSLR. The rangefinder alone has a huge number of individual parts.
It can be addictive. Since I picked up an M8.2 in July, I haven't taken out the 5DII. I even left it at home for a trip to Asia and didn't regret it at all. I may actually just get rid of the entire DSLR kit.
jhapeman wrote:
It can be addictive. Since I picked up an M8.2 in July, I haven't taken out the 5DII. I even left it at home for a trip to Asia and didn't regret it at all. I may actually just get rid of the entire DSLR kit.
I've considered this with my D700. What's holding me back is my kids in sports. Of course, once they are done, then there will be grandchildren
BTW--the M3 is a re-paint. I found an extra set of top and bottom and had them painted. Still have the original chrome top and bottom in case I decide black isn't for me
