p.2 #1 · Comparison between 17 Tilt, 24 Tilt MKI & 16-35MK II CC welcome
PhotoMaximum wrote:
PS: Cameron12X, that shot was done at f/11 at about 18mm and it was slightly cropped in PP. That image is from three different exposures. One shot was for the sky, way underexposed using tungsten WB. The main one was shot on AW. The third shot was with two strobes at a higher shutter speed to light some of the bush and trees. I then using a quick set of masking layers and painted in the three layers to get the look I was after. My client was very happy with this shot.
Thanks very much for the information. Any chance of posting the original, un-cropped image? I'm very much interested in seeing how much distortion there is along the edges for the 16-35mm lens. Any examples to share at full 16mm? Thanks!
