moondigger wrote:
...Roy, I think your reasoning here is pretty good, but it misses one point that is heavily dependent on the monitor and not on the person... the gamut of the monitor. ....
We are in 100% agreement. I wrote:..."Assuming your monitor is at least roughly calibrated, ie. reds look red, not green, and assuming it can represent fine differences of color, then..."
After repeating the test I got 40 this time, much better than the 100 odd I got the first time. I'm happy as I know I'm colour deficient. I have trouble discerning differences in pastels and dark colours.
I scored a 7 on this test using an uncalibrated TN monitor. However, after staring at squares and lines for a while, the lines started to curve, distort, warp and colors start changing. I came to realize exactly why I don't care about calibrating my monitor: My eyes will play tricks on me no matter what.
kakomu wrote:
I scored a 7 on this test using an uncalibrated TN monitor. However, after staring at squares and lines for a while, the lines started to curve, distort, warp and colors start changing.