jhapeman wrote:
Yes, and of course, the 14mm f/2.8L is a very pedestrian lens. I have the Mk I version and its OK. That's a sad commentary on what is a very pricey lens. Of course, when you need that 2mm, you need it.
Jeff
RobertLynn wrote:
I'd say it's worth it, if you're shooting lower light events, where you have to have it, then yes.
It's a full stop faster, and that's where they get ya!
Only if it's usable at that full stop. My 17-40L is very usable and nice at f/4, but the 16-35 mkII I tested was not pleasing at f/2.8. Had to take it to f/3.5 before it was on par with the 17-40L, and that's just not acceptable.
Canon f/2.8 zooms are nice when you get that "right" sample, but a nightmare when you don't.
