dmwierz wrote:
Bob, this just sounds incomplete. OK, I have never shot shooting (that sounds weird), but I've never shot underwater either, and would imagine it, too, presents a lot of technical challenges, but look at the work of Donald Miralle, who puts camera and even flashes, strobes and Pocket Wizards in some places where a "normal" person would say there's "no way to put a camera and a flash in the water"...just think about it.
Just do a Google search on Miralle and "underwater photography" for many, many more examples.
Stretch your imagination - I'm guessing there are some amazing images to be captured by the creative photographer who doesn't let traditional thinking limit him/her....Show more →
I agree with the you on this, but as I have never shot this before and the level of shooting was from first timers to pros.
A little leary of getting to close. The first timers def shot off target alot.
I should say for me with 1 camera no way to get in front of shooters.
Thanks Bob
Gatorboy wrote:
The guys shooting would have to be downright horrible to hit your camera (without trying). I used to shoot field archery, and at 50 yards or less, it's rare to even miss the target -- let alone a camera sitting a few feet off of the target -- so, I would think a gun would be even more accurate.
Some of them were horrible as they had not done this before.
Even at close range they missed as they tried to shoot on the move.
The pros were very acurate even when jumping and shooting.
We also had 1 gun malfunction while loading with the gun discharging.
Thanks for the comment
Bob
Thanks for the comments and pics andrew.
Remote angle is cool.
ROs would not let anyone to the side during shooting as it is a very cramped in some of ranges.
Thanks for the comments
Bob
