Jorgen Udvang Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
jamesf99 wrote:
Well, we obviously disagree and yes, other things do matter; a lot if you're thinking of buying a "system". If it's a P&S, you still need to think of things like duplicating lenses, different batteries (certainly not a unique problem as mfgs change these all the time), and the chance that the system can't keep up with sensor changes (I don't buy APS-C lenses). Do I know that it can't or won't keep up for sure? No, of course not, but you don't have to look far to see what's happening, and even those fanatical Nikon people are reassessing their commitment to DX (I keep using Nikon as an example because I've found the users to be the most loyal (read: most susceptible to marketing or "gullible"). No one even remotely on the ball could (or should have) believe Nikon at their word, or I hope not.....
I never believed them. Not for a minute.....
...Show more →
"System" is one of the strongest side of 4/3. All lenses are designed for the system and for the sensor size, and there's no reason why they would change that. As for batteries (since you mention it), if you look at Olympus, most of their 4/3 cameras (E-1, E-3, E-300, E-330, E-500 and E-510) use the same battery. Only the tiny E-400/410 uses a smaller one, due to the physical size of the camera. I would like to see another system that duplicates this.
I'm also a Nikon user, and since my Nikon (Fuji S3) is a DX format camera, I assume that you will categorise me as one of the DX fanatics While I appreciate some photographers' need for ISO25600 and/or 20MP, most of us don't have that need, and those needs are the only ones I can see as reasons to buy an FF/FX camera. If you know any other reasons, please tell me.
I'm already taking photos more or less in the dark at ISO800 with my E-1. I'm sure it will be easier at ISO1600 with IS on an E-3 or ISO3200 with a D300, but I can assure you: this is not what defines my hardware needs as a photographer.
What is important is a selection of good quality lenses at reasonable prices. Those lenses are available for all formats, but in my view, 4/3 clearly has the edge, which was the most important reason for me to buy into the system in the first place. It's simply a very easy system to live with.
Currently, there are 3 (three) FF cameras on the market: 1DsIII, 5D and D3 in addition to the oddball 1DIII. At the same time, there are at least 15 APS C and 5 or 6 4/3 cameras available. Most of those have production volumes that outnumbers the total production of FF cameras by a healthy margin.
Nikon just released the APS-C D300, a camera clearly aimed at professional photographers and serious amateurs. If that isn't proof of their commitment to the format, I don't know what is.
Wouldn't I like to have an FF camera then? Of course I would, just as I would like to have an MF camera. But do I really need one? Would my photos be better if I had one? Nah... I don't think so. And I don't want to carry the weight. Olympus gives me 400mm (eqv.) reach, f/3.5 within less than 2 kilos. Suits me fine. I can take it everywhere, just like a point & shoot 
|