fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       end
  

Archive 2005 · Thinking of making the switch.

  
 
Jon Arno
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Thinking of making the switch.


Thanks guys, the main reason I'm thinking of making the switch is because of the reasone stated above by Joe, and I think I'm going to need that quick shooting ability.

I totally know how that happens, I'm on the field an awesome shot, and I miss the first time and oh.....I have to wait for the camera, and I've missed it!

This helps with the decision. Thanks everyone



Apr 16, 2005 at 07:41 PM
MPerdomo
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Thinking of making the switch.


I wouldnt recommend switching to Canon for 6MP vs 8MP. It's not really a huge difference.

But if there is something the D70 can't do as well (High-ISO and Fast Bursts mainly), then go for it.

I personally love my D70. It'll suffice until I can get enough glass to warrant a pro-series body (D2Hs and D2X look really, really nice).



Apr 16, 2005 at 08:14 PM
amci4
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Thinking of making the switch.


I have to second this as I think the D70 with the Sigma 70 - 200 HSM APO would resolve excellent detail and even allow you to get large prints out of the images.

HinduG wrote:
How much big of a print do you want to make?

The 20D has no discernable shutter lag. It also has good high iso qualities which'll be nice for your sports shots.

As far as detail, I think the biggest problem is your lens lineup. I'm sure if you picked up some faster nikkor zooms, you would definitely see a major improvement. If you buy a 20D with the Canon equivalent lenses to what you own, you would probably be disappointed (except the 17-85 has image stabilization).

just my worthless opinion.




Apr 16, 2005 at 08:18 PM
phidong
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Thinking of making the switch.


Jon Arno wrote:
Thanks guys, the main reason I'm thinking of making the switch is because of the reasone stated above by Joe, and I think I'm going to need that quick shooting ability.

I totally know how that happens, I'm on the field an awesome shot, and I miss the first time and oh.....I have to wait for the camera, and I've missed it!

This helps with the decision. Thanks everyone


IS THE D70 THAT SLOW?

Maybe the equipment isn't at fault and it's your timing and anticipation that needs a little polishing.



Apr 16, 2005 at 08:28 PM
Jon Arno
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · Thinking of making the switch.


Maybe, but I don't think so.

But thats only one reason, countless others have been mentioned.



Apr 16, 2005 at 09:34 PM
amci4
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Thinking of making the switch.


No Way, My D100 had more DR than my D70 and from all the tests I've seen the D100 was pretty close to what the 20D was showing but it had better contrast...

As for the D70 vs 20D yes it is slightly higher due to the decrease in contrast.

Peter Gregg wrote:
The 20D is a better camera than the D70 so if you can do it you will be happier in the long run. The 20D has better dynamic range than the D70, in fact it is near the top in dynamic range and the D70 is about in the middle but definitely above the D100.

Dynamic range is what will get you the better looking pictures and not the jump from 6mp to 8mp. Going from 6mp to 8mp is not going to hurt, but the results are going to come from the better sensor giving you less blooms and
...Show more



Apr 16, 2005 at 09:43 PM
H. Hoolee
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · Thinking of making the switch.


If you have any manual focus Nikkor lenses, they can be used on your Canon DSLR with an adapter. Of course, you'll be operating the camera manually.


Apr 16, 2005 at 09:59 PM
phidong
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · Thinking of making the switch.


:worried: I haven't heard you give a single valid reason of why you should switch systems.


Apr 16, 2005 at 10:05 PM
phidong
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #9 · Thinking of making the switch.


Okay so I'm pretty sure I'm going to make the switch over to Canon, I have a D70 kit with 70-300mm, I love it. But I need something for bigger prints and more detail and a faster shutter actuation speed, there is a little bit of a lag between actuation and shot. Is the 20D better for the job, of motorsports and sports photography?

The other question is the asking price, or trade value?


Jon,
I have not seen you make a compelling argument as to why you should switch yet. You list a couple of possible reasons, but mostly let others do the talking for you and none of the things you listed are even concrete. In my opinion the only reason someone should switch systems is if there is a SIGNIFICANT benefit which is DIRECTLY related to switching systems. In this case, I don't believe there is solid reasoning behind your decision.

The comparison between 6 and 8 megapixels is hardly signficant. I've seen prints from both and I'm sure if you saw large prints from both you couldn't pick out the one with 8 megapixels vs. the one with 6. There is about a 20% increase in image size between 6 and 8. Is this completely necessary? No. You are fine just where you are.


Thanks guys, the main reason I'm thinking of making the switch is because of the reasone stated above by Joe, and I think I'm going to need that quick shooting ability.

I totally know how that happens, I'm on the field an awesome shot, and I miss the first time and oh.....I have to wait for the camera, and I've missed it!

This helps with the decision. Thanks everyone


Maybe the equipment isn't at fault and it's your timing and anticipation that needs a little polishing.

Jon Arno wrote:
Maybe, but I don't think so.

But thats only one reason, countless others have been mentioned.


You need faster shutter actuation speed? Do you really? When I first started motorsports photography, I used to burst all the time too. My first shot, oddly enough, would usually be the best of each series. As I began shooting more and more and getting experience with the sport and being out there I began to get more series with better first images. I'm barely even bursting anymore. The last event I covered, I did a full five frame burst two times (over a TWO DAY EVENT). It happened to be the last run of the day and I wanted to make sure I had something, but for most of the other runs I was only doing one shot series. You have to wonder why I'm getting the best keeper on the first shot. Is my equipment getting better or is my timing, anticipation, and knowledge of the sport I'm photographing getting better? I would argue the latter considering I haven't upgraded equipment in the last 6 months.

People are too quick to blame equipment for their faults. You purchase a $1,500 camera and expect your pictures to be great because other people with $1,500 cameras are taking great pictures. I more frequently hear people say something on the lines of, "My camera isn't working correctly" or "I need to get a better camera". The majority of the time, the problem has nothing to do with the camera, rather the person behind the lens eitehr doesn't know how to operate it or is too quick to redirect blame.

Secondly a lot of people have commented that perhaps you need better lenses. Your signature states that you are using a the kit, 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 and a 70-300mm f/4-5.6. You seem to be all over upgrading equipment, but you overlook your own signature? There is no doubt in my mind that owning a D70 and a 70-200mm f/2.8 VR would vastly improve the chances of you capturing great motorsports pictures, not that the gear has a lot of impact on the types of pictures that you will be producing.

Unfortunately for you, it seems from your responses that you are determined to switch systems. You have already made your mind up and that is fine. I hope you enjoy your endless quest for the perfect camera, because no matter what system you're in there will always be flaws. Only one thing can counter those flaws, experience.

Phi



Apr 16, 2005 at 11:11 PM
MPerdomo
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · Thinking of making the switch.


I am with the above poster.

It doesn't seem like he actually "needs" anything the 20D or Canon has to offer.

If there were no cost involved in "switching", it wouldnt be any real problem. But this involves taking a loss on the gear, then buying all new gear. That money (im guessing at least $300 is going to be "lost") could easily be spent on things to improve photos, such as a fast, tack-sharp prime, that would yield far better images than a 20D and cheap zoom combo (not dissing the 20D or Canon lenses here...just so you guys don't flame me for that!).



Apr 17, 2005 at 01:12 AM
braindeadmac
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #11 · Thinking of making the switch.


phidong wrote:
Pretty subjective.


The whole choice between Nikon and Canon is pretty subjective, as is the choice between film and digital.



Apr 17, 2005 at 06:56 AM
Wasy
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #12 · Thinking of making the switch.


Jon
I am with Phi.

All you need is a shelter and something to eat. So if your capability of making pictures is directly related to this - well then yes, you need it. (but then go for the pro-kit)
Otherwise you (and most of us, me included) "just have to have it" So don't ask - you will buy it anyway .

But do tell us how it went and show us the results - and show us that we were wrong. It will give me a good pretext to buy one too



Apr 17, 2005 at 09:48 AM
joezasada
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #13 · Thinking of making the switch.


Phi - I see you shoot with the 20D - as I do

the issue isn't bursts or tiing or anticipation. a good shutter finger will always mean better shots

BUT

it's that the D70 has lag AFTER you press the shutter release. sure, it'll do a burst, or it'll do a single frame - but you have to wait about a second after you shoot before you can shoot another frame.

with my 20D and when I'm shooting sports or other "action" I'll often pop off shots manually without using a burst but at speeds of 2 or 3 fps. you can't do that with a D70.

I know users that shoot with a D70 and though they like their cameras, that shutter lag is their biggest compaint.

try it out next time you're at the camera shop.

ture, one camera body alone may not be a big enough reason for me or you to switch entire systems - but, given that a 20D outperforms a D70, D100, D2H - while a 10D, 20D are better - the D2X is the only Nikon that can out-do a 20D (in my opinion, anyways). The Canon 1 series are the best - but expensive - as is a 20D.

for action the 20D kills anything nikon except the D2X or the D2H (but only 4 meg).




Apr 26, 2005 at 12:40 AM
jmcfadden
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · Thinking of making the switch.


https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/215519


Apr 26, 2005 at 12:54 AM
silvertipimage
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #15 · Thinking of making the switch.


I made the switch to Canon in Aug and have never looked back. Just finished moving most of my Nikon lens only have a few left. Love my Canon gear...20D is a nice camera and believe you would enjoy it...


Apr 26, 2005 at 01:34 AM
RomanM
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #16 · Thinking of making the switch.


phidong wrote:
...The comparison between 6 and 8 megapixels is hardly signficant. I've seen prints from both and I'm sure if you saw large prints from both you couldn't pick out the one with 8 megapixels vs. the one with 6. There is about a 20% increase in image size between 6 and 8....


Really? Strange. 6 to 8 = 33.33...% more. Or I'm missing something here?



Apr 26, 2005 at 02:11 AM
Xavier Rival
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #17 · Thinking of making the switch.


RomanM wrote
Really? Strange. 6 to 8 = 33.33...% more. Or I'm missing something here?

Indeed, 6 to 8 is 33% more if you count pixels.
But the improvement in linear resolution is much less than that. You have to compute the square root of 1.33 and you get something around 1.17, which amounts to a 17% increase in linear resolution.
If you want to print at the same resolution as a 10" print of your D70, you can go up to 11.7" (increase in area of 33%, in length of 17%).
Not much.

Not enough to switch in my opinion. Not even enough to upgrade to a new camera (look at the number of 10D, D60, 300D around... not to mention some people report being very happy with D30).

I would also like to point out that the D100 is said to be about to be replaced this year. It could be a worthwhile upgrade from a D70 (maybe with more resolution than 20D).

I would not go too fast.



Apr 26, 2005 at 04:28 AM
hongkietan
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #18 · Thinking of making the switch.


A camera is just a tool to get a job done, nothing more but nothing less. So define what the job is and select your tools accordingly.

success HK



Apr 26, 2005 at 05:15 AM
Peter de Weerdt
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #19 · Thinking of making the switch.


I work with both systems and own Canon gear. As much as I love the Canon system, really if I had a D70, I wouldn't switch to the 20D. Unless there is some very specific feature you need from the 20D or something of the D70 really annoys you, I would recommend you to stay where you are. You must be a pixelpeeper to see the differences in image quality and it probably isn't worth the money. I guess it's better to wait for the next upgrade from Nikon or switch to a pro model if you really need an upgrade. That will probably a step that adds much more value and is a real upgrade instead of a subtle gradual migration to just another system.

Peter



Apr 26, 2005 at 07:45 AM
johnnymg
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #20 · Thinking of making the switch.


Peter de Weerdt wrote:
I work with both systems and own Canon gear. As much as I love the Canon system, really if I had a D70, I wouldn't switch to the 20D. Unless there is some very specific feature you need from the 20D or something of the D70 really annoys you, I would recommend you to stay where you are. You must be a pixelpeeper to see the differences in image quality and it probably isn't worth the money. I guess it's better to wait for the next upgrade from Nikon or switch to a pro model if you really
...Show more

Good comments Peter

FWIW: I've got a D70 and other than it's slightly sluggish "speed" it's a great little camera. I would not switch it for a 20D.

HOWEVER:
**** For sports, I would recommend the 1DMII or the D2H. 8 FPS is soooooooo awesome!!!! ......... once you rip off a burst at that rate you will NEVER go back. The D2H is THE best sports bargain right now. If you have the $ then the 1DMII is the better body.

Regards
JohnG





Apr 26, 2005 at 09:32 PM
1              3       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account