I'm not at all sure that 1/8000 with ISO 50 with the mechanical shutter wouldn't be just as good of an image or even a better image than 1/16000 and ISO 100 with the electronic shutter and of course they would be the same exposure. Remember the electronic shutter will cause you a hit in dynamic range on this camera. Someone could begin to address this issue by comparing 1/4000 and ISO 50 with the mechanical shutter to 1/8000 and ISO 100 with the electronic shutter. I would actually expect that going with the mechanical shutter and ISO 50 and 1/4000 will probably get you a better image. So most of the time you would probably be better not using that 1/16000 on the electronic shutter anyway. 1/32000 is even more of an edge case and probably requires the faster sensor scan speed of the A1 II.
So, I am guessing this is a tempest in a tea pot and the 1/8000 limit on the electronic shutter isn't likely to be a big deal for almost anyone as they are better off using 1/8000 and the mechanical shutter and ISO 50 than 1/16000 on the electronic shutter.
ISO 50 isn't "real", nor does it behave like a "real" base ISO 50 would, so either way, you should have put a 3 stop ND on before this conversation even started
RoamingScott wrote:
ISO 50 isn't "real", nor does it behave like a "real" base ISO 50 would, so either way, you should have put a 3 stop ND on before this conversation even started
That is true, but it is also true that with this camera base ISO 100 with the electronic shutter isn't the same as base ISO 100 with the mechanical shutter. People who are asking for the faster electronic shutter don't seem to be recognizing that. The real question is whether the highlights will blow out more with 1/8000 and ISO 50 with the mechanical shutter or 1/16000 with the electronic shutter. I am not sure that answer to that is as obvious as people asking for the faster electronic shutter seem to be assuming.
An yes an ND filter is a lot better way to go if you don't want to stop down and face these situations often.
Donzo98 wrote:
I was very surprised to see the max shutter speed was only 1/8000 even in electronic shutter. I don't see many posts that mention it...
I have needed more than 1/8000 occasionally.... and I was happy to have up to 1/32000 on my A1/II.
Does this bother anyone??
Nope. If this for engineering or sport maybe get the A9 III.
I don't recall ever needing to go much over over 1/4000 in the last 50 years.
I hope to use my a7RVI at 1/60 MS where possible for best IQ.
EB-1 wrote: Donzo98 wroteI was very surprised to see the max shutter speed was only 1/8000 even in electronic shutter. I don't see many posts that mention it...
I have needed more than 1/8000 occasionally.... and I was happy to have up to 1/32000 on my A1/II.
Does this bother anyone??Nope. If this for engineering or sport maybe get the A9 III.
I don't recall ever needing to go much over over 1/4000 in the last 50 years.
I hope to use my a7RVI at 1/60 MS where possible for best IQ.
EBH
That is weird, because I haven't been alive 50 years, and only started photography in 2018...and I could think of a day just off the top of my head when I needed 1/8000. It was with the 135 1.8. Snow and the sun.
RoamingScott wrote:
One of the big perks of my FULLY stacked (not the marketing stacked) sensor camera is shooting my f/1.2 glass wide open midday with no ND needed. My $1200 camera can do work at 1/8000
Yeah I agree, but I'm used to CPL, so that's my solution.
shadow9d9 wrote: EB-1 wroteDonzo98 wroteI was very surprised to see the max shutter speed was only 1/8000 even in electronic shutter. I don't see many posts that mention it...
I have needed more than 1/8000 occasionally.... and I was happy to have up to 1/32000 on my A1/II.
Does this bother anyone??Nope. If this for engineering or sport maybe get the A9 III.
I don't recall ever needing to go much over over 1/4000 in the last 50 years.
I hope to use my a7RVI at 1/60 MS where possible for best IQ.
EBHThat is weird, because I haven't been alive 50 years, and only started photography in 2018...and I could think of a day just off the top of my head when I needed 1/8000. It was with the 135 1.8. Snow and the sun.
chez wrote: shadow9d9 wroteEB-1 wroteDonzo98 wroteI was very surprised to see the max shutter speed was only 1/8000 even in electronic shutter. I don't see many posts that mention it...
I have needed more than 1/8000 occasionally.... and I was happy to have up to 1/32000 on my A1/II.
Does this bother anyone??Nope. If this for engineering or sport maybe get the A9 III.
I don't recall ever needing to go much over over 1/4000 in the last 50 years.
I hope to use my a7RVI at 1/60 MS where possible for best IQ.
EBHThat is weird, because I haven't been alive 50 years, and only started photography in 2018...and I could think of a day just off the top of my head when I needed 1/8000. It was with the 135 1.8. Snow and the sun.
That is a weak argument, because it could also be used to argue that we should still be at 1fps, or manual only, etc, since people did it for decades fine. People are allowed to enjoy the advancement of technology and the ease and comforts that come with it.
shadow9d9 wrote: chez wroteshadow9d9 wroteEB-1 wroteDonzo98 wroteI was very surprised to see the max shutter speed was only 1/8000 even in electronic shutter. I don't see many posts that mention it...
I have needed more than 1/8000 occasionally.... and I was happy to have up to 1/32000 on my A1/II.
Does this bother anyone??Nope. If this for engineering or sport maybe get the A9 III.
I don't recall ever needing to go much over over 1/4000 in the last 50 years.
I hope to use my a7RVI at 1/60 MS where possible for best IQ.
EBHThat is weird, because I haven't been alive 50 years, and only started photography in 2018...and I could think of a day just off the top of my head when I needed 1/8000. It was with the 135 1.8. Snow and the sun.
https://uadarthmaul.smugmug.com/Elli-in-the-snowUntil recently the max shutter was 1/8000 for many of the cameras…and everyone seemed to manage taking photos in snow and sun.That is a weak argument, because it could also be used to argue that we should still be at 1fps, or manual only, etc, since people did it for decades fine. People are allowed to enjoy the advancement of technology and the ease and comforts that come with it.
No one is disallowing the enjoyment of the advancements of technology. Faster fps, auto settings, etc. are great features. I think the argument is simply that not every camera needs to have every feature, or the maximum of every feature, in order to be very useful. People are allowed to enjoy the fastest cars on Earth, but not every car needs to be the fastest car on Earth in order to be very useful.
shadow9d9 wrote: EB-1 wroteDonzo98 wroteI was very surprised to see the max shutter speed was only 1/8000 even in electronic shutter. I don't see many posts that mention it...
I have needed more than 1/8000 occasionally.... and I was happy to have up to 1/32000 on my A1/II.
Does this bother anyone??Nope. If this for engineering or sport maybe get the A9 III.
I don't recall ever needing to go much over over 1/4000 in the last 50 years.
I hope to use my a7RVI at 1/60 MS where possible for best IQ.
EBHThat is weird, because I haven't been alive 50 years, and only started photography in 2018...and I could think of a day just off the top of my head when I needed 1/8000. It was with the 135 1.8. Snow and the sun.
I'm sure people can find some unusual usages, but that's easily avoided if you went with longer lens/smaller apertures or a simple ND filter. Action typically doesn't need the high IQ an a7R delivers. You could get by with lower quality and higher speed for most customers of dog ability.
shadow9d9 wrote: EB-1 wroteDonzo98 wroteI was very surprised to see the max shutter speed was only 1/8000 even in electronic shutter. I don't see many posts that mention it...
I have needed more than 1/8000 occasionally.... and I was happy to have up to 1/32000 on my A1/II.
Does this bother anyone??Nope. If this for engineering or sport maybe get the A9 III.
I don't recall ever needing to go much over over 1/4000 in the last 50 years.
I hope to use my a7RVI at 1/60 MS where possible for best IQ.
EBHThat is weird, because I haven't been alive 50 years, and only started photography in 2018...and I could think of a day just off the top of my head when I needed 1/8000. It was with the 135 1.8. Snow and the sun.
The point isn’t that there never has been a case where 1/8000 second was needed. Sunny 16 in full sunlight @ 100 ISO needs 1/8000 @ f/1.8. The point is, some of us prefer to use an “R’ camera.. I sold my ‘A” for higher resolution once I no longer shot field sports.. I also have been in photography since the mid 1960s and haven’t needed shutter speeds shorter than 1/8000. I have multiple f/1.2 and f/1.4 lenses used on film cameras and I routinely use ND filters here. I don’t have a ND for the FE 50-150mm f/2.0 GM. Given the expense of such a large ND filter, this will be my first lens where I’ll be shooting at close to 1/8000 second. BTW.. really nice images of your dog.
shadow9d9 wrote: chez wroteshadow9d9 wroteEB-1 wroteDonzo98 wroteI was very surprised to see the max shutter speed was only 1/8000 even in electronic shutter. I don't see many posts that mention it...
I have needed more than 1/8000 occasionally.... and I was happy to have up to 1/32000 on my A1/II.
Does this bother anyone??Nope. If this for engineering or sport maybe get the A9 III.
I don't recall ever needing to go much over over 1/4000 in the last 50 years.
I hope to use my a7RVI at 1/60 MS where possible for best IQ.
EBHThat is weird, because I haven't been alive 50 years, and only started photography in 2018...and I could think of a day just off the top of my head when I needed 1/8000. It was with the 135 1.8. Snow and the sun.
https://uadarthmaul.smugmug.com/Elli-in-the-snowUntil recently the max shutter was 1/8000 for many of the cameras…and everyone seemed to manage taking photos in snow and sun.That is a weak argument, because it could also be used to argue that we should still be at 1fps, or manual only, etc, since people did it for decades fine. People are allowed to enjoy the advancement of technology and the ease and comforts that come with it.
So if you cannot live with just 1/8000 as the fastest shutter then you should look at a different camera. Just like I can’t stand the size and weight of the z8…I don’t complain about it…I look at smaller cameras.