I imagine this question has already been asked, but my research hasn’t turned up much.
I am looking for a travel companion for my 35 mm GM. I love it, but I’d like a “discreet”/“compact” version. My ideal would be a Loxia 35 mm f/2 with autofocus (so… not a Loxia).
Therefore I am looking for:
- 35 mm focal length
- Form factor similar to a Loxia 35 mm
- Maximum aperture ≤ f/2
- Autofocus
- Aperture ring
- Size is more important than weight
- (the rendering characteristics of a Loxia)
Viltrox 35 EVO has a band of followers. Excellent image quality, but some report inconsistent AF. You can see images from it in the Viltrox thread inside the Sony forum. It’s also 20% off right now on Amazon Prime days, just over $300.
The Samyang 35mm gets a lot of kudos as well. It doesn’t have an aperture ring per se, but has a custom switch that changes the front ring from manual focus to manual aperture selection. This switch is programmable.
Sony does make a 35mm f/1.8. It is sharp and fast focussing.. It has a lot of chromatic aberration, however, and I personally don't like the bokeh much.
I prefer the Sigma 35 f/2, but it really isn't a little brother to the 35 GM. It has a different look and a different set of design priorities.
Wow, 7 answers in less than 1 hour. Thank you! Already a lot of information. I'm gonna study this Sigma 35mm F2 this afternoon and maybe come back with questions .
There also is the "tiny little brother" Sony FE 35mm F2.8 Zeiss Sonner T*, but is only f/2.8 which does not meet your criteria.
It is small and tiny, excelent for travel and when you want to be "discreet / compact"; It can be found used for a good price. It is older lens (one of the first released for Sony FF back in the days) but still one of the lightest and most compact options available. It may lack a bit the clinical sharpness of modern lenses.
Clinical sharpness is not a requirement. I have the GM for that. I would even prefer a lens with character. Which one (of the listed in this thread) have more character?
tuxounet wrote:
Clinical sharpness is not a requirement. I have the GM for that. I would even prefer a lens with character. Which one (of the listed in this thread) have more character?
Imperfections giving beauty to the image. Something more analog, cinematic.
Surfnsun wrote:
Define character.
tuxounet wroteClinical sharpness is not a requirement. I have the GM for that. I would even prefer a lens with character. Which one (of the listed in this thread) have more character?
tuxounet wroteClinical sharpness is not a requirement. I have the GM for that. I would even prefer a lens with character. Which one (of the listed in this thread) have more character?
"Camera lens character refers to the unique, subjective optical qualities of a lens that define how it "draws" an image, beyond basic technical performance like sharpness. It is a combination of optical quirks—such as color rendering, bokeh, flare, and contrast—that give photographs or footage an artistic, emotional, or distinct personality."
Al Trujillo wrote:
I was going to suggest the CV APO 35/2 but like the Loxia it is MF only.
Unlike the Loxia, the CV APO 35/2 is an exceptional lens. I own the Loxia…love it for landscapes at F/8-11…and for nothing else. I wish I owned the CV as it looks absolutely superb from all I’ve seen from it.
My 35GM mini is the tiny/superlight Samyang 35mm 1.8. It’s a plastic-fantastic that weighs next to nothing and is quite usable at every aperture and has excellent contrast/sharpness across the frame from F2.8.
However, if I didn’t already have the Samyang I’d probably would be getting the Viltrox 35mm EVO…$300 for a sharp apochromatic lens? Amazing value.
darbo wrote: Al Trujillo wroteI was going to suggest the CV APO 35/2 but like the Loxia it is MF only.Unlike the Loxia, the CV APO 35/2 is an exceptional lens. I own the Loxia…love it for landscapes at F/8-11…and for nothing else. I wish I owned the CV as it looks absolutely superb from all I’ve seen from it.
tuxounet wrote: darbo wroteAl Trujillo wroteI was going to suggest the CV APO 35/2 but like the Loxia it is MF only.Unlike the Loxia, the CV APO 35/2 is an exceptional lens. I own the Loxia…love it for landscapes at F/8-11…and for nothing else. I wish I owned the CV as it looks absolutely superb from all I’ve seen from it.Yes, but they are MF…
Quite right…I was just responding to someone else’s comment, which is why I immediately followed up with a comment specifically addressing your original post. Maybe someone can give some contrary insight, but I just don’t think you’re going to find any good character autofocusing lenses for Sony. The best you can do is just get something competent.
Of the above-mentioned autofocusing suggestions, I think the Sigma 35mm F/2 may have the smoothest and most elegant rendering from what I’ve seen.
tuxounet wrote:
Imperfections giving beauty to the image. Something more analog, cinematic.
Surfnsun wroteDefine character.
tuxounet wroteClinical sharpness is not a requirement. I have the GM for that. I would even prefer a lens with character. Which one (of the listed in this thread) have more character?
Sigma 35i. I have been reaching for the 35GM more recently, but I have many lovely photos shot with the Sigma over the years. I got mine used from a local camera store for $300, so at that price, if you don't like it, you can sell it for probably what you paid for it
#14 They were going pretty well, until this piece:
'It is a combination of optical *quirks*—such as color rendering, bokeh, flare, and contrast—that give photographs or footage an artistic, emotional, or distinct personality."
The best propaganda works by inserting a single negative inside otherwise positive text:
Quirk (definition): 'a quirk is a peculiar behavioral habit, a strange twist of fate, or an unpredictable irregularity in a system.'
We can do better, for example: >
'Lens 'character' is the intentional outcome of explicit design choices that, taken together, engender the designers' vision for lens imaging styles that delivers a gestalt of endearing qualities - so as to appeal to those seeking artistry in their photographic pursuits, rather than base level technical performance.' Antonyms: clinical, performative, technical.