Imagemaster wrote:
Arash, do you find the AF as good as A1 or A1 II? Seems to be no rolling-shutter effect on those shots.
Tony
Hey Tony,
there were some shots were the rolling shutter had distorted the background, mainly when you have trees in the BG or bushes that are closer. I didn't post those
The AF is close but not as good as the A1 series. When the bird is flying parallel it is great but when is coming right at you it has fewer tack sharp frames, I think it's from 60 AF cycles per second vs. 120 AF cycles per second in A1 II....
there were some shots were the rolling shutter had distorted the background, mainly when you have trees in the BG or bushes that are closer. I didn't post those
The AF is close but not as good as the A1 series. When the bird is flying parallel it is great but when is coming right at you it has fewer tack sharp frames, I think it's from 60 AF cycles per second vs. 120 AF cycles per second in A1 II....
Thanks. Sounds like the A7V could be a better choice for someone that does not need 66mp and wants to spend $1500 less than the A7R VI.
Imagemaster wrote:
Thanks. Sounds like the A7V could be a better choice for someone that does not need 66mp and wants to spend $1500 less than the A7R VI.
