If anyone is questioning wether or not this is the right forum for these types of images, let me set you straight
If you remember being a 10 year old kid 60 years ago, a common put down would be to call a kid a "drip". Well, I had a mildly obnoxious friend, and when we called him a drip, this was his comeback;
" A drip is a drop, a drop is water, water is nature, nature is beautiful, thanks for the compliment." So there, take that
My wife and I still laugh at that to this day. Thanks for taking a look at my ongoing project.
Gary
These are coming along wonderfully Garry. When I read the subject and start to scroll down at first I saw that tiny drop on the top of the first image and was thinking I would see just that in a minimalist image. While that did not appear, I loved what I saw and the following images as well.
morris wrote:
These are coming along wonderfully Garry. When I read the subject and start to scroll down at first I saw that tiny drop on the top of the first image and was thinking I would see just that in a minimalist image. While that did not appear, I loved what I saw and the following images as well.
Morris
Thanks Morris. Next step is to follow Birdie's suggestion and make my water a bit thicker.
vbnut wrote:
Nicely done. Is #2 the "collision" that you said in a previous thread that you were trying to capture?
Pretty much but not quite. I've been using my OM-1 with the 90 Macro. That's giving me an 180mm Equivalent. I think that's too much FL. I need more depth of field so I think Im going to switch to a D200 I still have hanging around and an older 105 macro.
