fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
  

New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection

  
 
DTFagus
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Hey folks,

in late April we are traveling with our 2 kids (8 and 9) for 3 weeks to New Zealand and will be visiting both north and south island with 6 airbnb bases and a rental car to move around.

Since this might be a "once in a lifetime" kind of vacation, I want make sure that I capture many memories in a (for me) meaningful way.

My current kit:
A7iii
24gm
50 1.4 Zeiss
85 1.8
Sigma 135 1.8

As you can see:

  1. I never liked zooms. I had a couple, but I was never satisfied with the images and I always felt they made me lazy in framing and primes forced me to get a little more creative.
  2. My tele options end with the 135mm. I never really missed the tele options. But that might be because I am mostly a family / people / portrait photographer.


For this trip I also bought (again...) the voigtlander 40 1.2. I LOVED this lens when I had it 6 years back, but kids were moving too fast and I was missing the autofocus. But this lens made me enjoy photography again and I want to take it with me on this trip.

What I am planning to take on the trip:

  1. 24gm
  2. 40 1.2
  3. 85 1.8
  4. Two iphones 17 pro


I think the 50 1.4 and 135 1.8 are simply too big and heavy for the trip. (Especially as photography is not a goal in itself. It is a family vacation).

As we are already paying a substantial 5 figure sum for this vacation we would not mind a lens purchase, if it means we can enjoy and capture our vacation without regrets. But I am quite happy with this selection and can't really imagine the situations where I'd be super bummed out not having another lens.

As said above, my travel experience is limited. So I would value an opinion from others who have made a trip to New Zealand (or similar) with family.

For context, we are planning:

  1. 3 nights auckland
  2. 3 nights Coromandel with beaches and national forest park
  3. 5 nights lake Taupo with trips to glowworm cave, zoo, maori village (dinner), geothermal parks in Rotorua, Hobbiton and blue spring hiking
  4. 2 nights in Wellington, then with ferry to south island
  5. 3 nights Tasman, mostly beaches and rock climbing
  6. 3 nights Christchurch. Swimming with dolphins and city exploration
  7. 2 nights lake Tekapo. Dark Sky observatory and hike to Mt Cook
  8. Flying Queenstown to Auckland and spend one more night there

    Now as I am writing this down, I am probably overthinking this and should just enjoy the trip and be happy that I can take pleasure in photography at all in that beautiful country





Feb 04, 2026 at 11:47 AM
akashyap
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Looks good, I like the decision to swap out the 50 ZA with the CV 40 - you will get INCREDIBLE photos of your family, especially at night.

I choose 3 out of my 4 prime lenses for travel too: 24 GM, CV 35/1.2, Sigma 45i, and Batis 85.



Feb 04, 2026 at 11:59 AM
grahamgibson
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Sounds like an amazing trip! For hiking, I think you'd really appreciate a zoom lens. Also, you'd probably find it fun to have something longer than 85mm at the zoo. So, maybe consider a Tamron 25-200 or Sigma 20-200. These might negate your desire to use a 24GM or 85mm, unless you really want the 24 for the night sky observatory.


Feb 04, 2026 at 12:14 PM
asekcsc5
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


I would consider taking only the 24 and the 50. With crop, you could have also a 35 and a 75. Less lens changes, and do not discount the utility of AF. The 40 is to be used at 1.2, otherwise why take it? And at 1.2 you need to be more careful when focusing. Which means more time...

christos



Feb 04, 2026 at 12:19 PM
zugzwang2
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Your proposed three lens kit seems reasonable to me. (I often hike with some subset of a Loxia 25, a Voigtlander 50 APO and a Zeiss 85mm f/4.) Here's something else that might work for your trip:

If you haven't already done so, find some way of maximizing your iPhone results. I took an iPhone 15 Pro on a sea kayaking trip last summer, and the results with Adobe Project Indigo (which blends seamlessly with Lightroom Mobile) were fine for my purposes. The whole process was very handy--albeit not for rapid-fire use, since there's a bit of a lag as the app processes the image. I suppose that other iPhone-compatible software could help you to avoid the over-processed native iPhone look as well.



Feb 04, 2026 at 12:57 PM
Garmadon
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


I just came back from thailand , I took the batis 25mm ,the zony 55mm and a gopro .
I left the 85mm at home .

I think 90%of the photos were with the 25mm . If you are used to this FL like me ,you will always get back to it because it can show the whole scene and it is what I usually want when I travel .
I use the gopro for video when I need its stabilization.

I think you will be fine with the 24mm and just one lens ,maybe the 50mm .



Feb 04, 2026 at 01:05 PM
old-gregg
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


This is all SUBJECTIVE. Why do you ask other people what lenses to bring on a trip? This depends on your fitness level, amount of cartilage you left in your knees, the focal length you "see" in, the subjects you shoot, and your wife's tolerance level for lens changing breaks.

So... unless you're traveling with my knees, my cartilage, my eyes and my wife (WTF?!) my advice would be utterly useless to you!

With that said, here's the advice:

1. Agree with your stance on zooms.
2. Lightweght 35mm + 85mm.

Edited on Feb 04, 2026 at 02:42 PM · View previous versions



Feb 04, 2026 at 02:40 PM
BillD208
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


I did a 3 week trip to NZ many years ago. For me zoom lenses made sense but it's up to you. I also brought a tripod and never regretted it but then again I wasn't traveling with kids. However, a tripod will allow you to be in the photos with your family.

If I were in your boat I'd buy a used Sony 20-70 (or another tele in that range) and a used Tamron 70-180 then sell them when I got home. It's a vacation and you will get great photos just don't overthink it. Good luck and you will have an incredible time down there.



Feb 04, 2026 at 02:40 PM
Taperwing
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


My wife and I spent a little over two weeks on the south island in March 2024, and in hindsight, could have easily spent another two weeks. For background, we are in our late 50’s, and primarily selected locations based on their scenic appeal and natural beauty, spending little time in any major city, other than flying in and out of Christchurch, and passing through Queenstown.

As you probably realize, NZ will be deep into autumn when you visit, with shorter daylight hours, highs in the 60’s, and lows around 40 F. Beaches will likely be just for visual/photographic appeal. A good bit out of the way, but if you are in the Abel Tasman area, Wharariki Beach was stunning. Try to go at low tide. The drive over towards Abel Tasman from Motueka will be an adventure to anyone prone to motion sickness. In fact, much of the driving on the south island was like that, mostly 2-lane roads, often with few straight patches over 500 meters.

As you also may know, the south island is split east and west by the southern Alps. What I didn't quite grasp until I was there, was the west side is often overcast, moody and wet, while the east side is often sunny, clear and dry.

Going to suggest you spend a good bit of time in your favorite mapping program, with the terrain feature turned on, and check point-to-point travel times. Honestly, figure on an average of 35mph tops. Far less if in tourist/photographer mode, as there are an extraordinary number of breathtaking views.

If you enjoy wine, even a little bit, know the south island produces many outstanding wines, and there are many wineries, quite small to grand, that you can visit for tasting and purchase. The Marlborough region is known for sauvignon blanc and the Central Otago region for Pinot Noir, although there are great wines produced all over the island. We scheduled some, and randomly fell into others, often based on a referral from another winery. I can provide some names, if interested.

If you are in the Marlborough area, the Omaka Aviation Heritage Centre in Blenheim is well worth the stop. Peter Jackson, of LotRings fame, got bitten hard by the WWI aviation bug, collected an incredible suite of memorabilia and aircraft, then made a museum to share his finds with the public. I grew up in the world of general aviation, and understandably, this was right up my alley. That said, even my wife, who is not an aviation devotee, quite enjoyed the stop. The displays are very cinematic.

At the opposite end of the island, we enjoyed an overnight on Doubtful Sound. A bit on the expensive side, but it was the highlight of our trip. Just a bit further north is Milford Sound, which is much easier to get to via car, where you can take a similarly incredible day trip.

In the middle, Aoraki Mount Cook NP was our favorite stop. Will likely be hovering around freezing when you visit, although some of the more popular trails, like the Hooker Track will be far less populated, although possibly icy or snowing in places. The freshwater icebergs in Hooker Lake took me by surprise. My wife was not a fan of the long suspension bridges.

FWIW, we started and ended with a few days in a rental car, and had 10 days in a camper van in the middle. Would have rented the camper van for longer, if it had been available. As long as your camper qualifies as ‘self contained’ (has a functional toilet) you are free to park up in any number of free, or low cost, sites. Note, these are without running water or hard facilities. Many small towns offer free camper water fil, and disposal.

Spend some time digging into NZ travel videos on YouTube, and ordering up a couple travel books through your library. Due to travel times, you will not likely be able to see even 50% of what sounds appealing. IMO, it is better to spend more time at fewer locations, but realize your view may be different.

Not going to suggest what camera gear to take. Too subjective. My favorite images were from my IR converted Fuji, but monochrome is my jam. If you have never tried before, consider taking multi-shot panoramas, either hand held or tripod mounted. Go for at least 50% overlap, and pick a lens and aperature with low vignetting. I like something moderately wide (23mm f/2 on my Fuji's), and typically shoot with the camera in portrait mode.



Feb 04, 2026 at 02:52 PM
Newsonys
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


To record memories, I'd personally prefer a wide angle zoom lens.
24 gm is a great lens but just not wide enough.
Budget friendly
Tamron 17-50
Tamron 20-40
Tamron 17-28
Tamron 11-20

For more money,
Tamron 16-30
Samyang 14-24

And I probably would pair it with either 50 or 85.

Since it would be a long, one time travel, versatility matters and I just personally would recommend 20mm or wider.



Feb 04, 2026 at 03:35 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

sbiswas12
Offline

Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


I can only say what I would take. Maybe it will help you.

Sony 16-35 PZ f/4
Sony 35 f1.8
Tamron 25-200 f/2.8 - 5.6

I feel that in a beautiful place like NZ with wonderful landscapes to take pictures of a wide angled zoom would come very handy. I personally would walk around with the 16-35 or the 25-200 depending on what I plan to do on a particular day and keep the 35 for low light / evening.

Whatever you decide to take you will have a wonderful time. Enjoy



Feb 04, 2026 at 05:47 PM
DWOfPaul
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Personally, when I think of landscape / travel / cityscape with other people, I think AF zooms. I am trying to get as many "good" pictures as possible in as quick a time as possible. Usually, my primes come out when I need low light or shallow depth of field, and my MF primes come out when I have time to go slow, switch lenses, and am trying for a few "great" pictures. I also don't know your photography style. You may prefer low light photos, shallow depth of field photos, or previsualizing your photos in your head, which primes work great for. Also, I would find 24mm limiting on the wide end for landscapes, but some people don't like the look of super wide angle lenses.

That all being said, I would personally add at least a super Zoom lens like the Sigma 20-200mm to your 3 lenses, which in good light will allow you to get wider and longer photos, without changing lenses. Even more so, I would think of adding a wide angle zoom and a telephoto zoom, such as a 16-35mm and 25-200mm or 50-400 (depending on size and weight tolerance) to cover a wider range and have better IQ. Adding a zoom or two would also give you some redundancy in case a lens gets damaged during travel.

It sounds like you have one awesome trip planned! enjoy!



Feb 04, 2026 at 07:04 PM
EB-1
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


I'd be using a normal zoom of some kind on a family trip, especially if using a low-res camera when cropping kills the megapixels. I'd also bring something longer, at least up to 200mm.

EBH



Feb 04, 2026 at 08:31 PM
Craig Gillette
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


I tend to be a zoom user. I think dealing with 3, or 4 or 5 primes to be it's own reward/punishment. Zoom selection choices have evolved over time, from cringing over the idea that 3x might be pushing it to the recent 10x 20-200.

I like the focal length range idea (but not weight, price and size) of the traditional trinity of f2.8 zooms, from 16mm or so to 200mm.swapping going on. I've used 18-135/140 for aps-c or the 28-200 for ff. with something to handle the wide side, if needed. Much of the time not needed. I don't know enough, for me, about the Sigma 20-200. It does intrigue me, could be a one and done addition to your camera bag?

"Place" matters. I live in California, much of my travel and pretty much all when the kids were that age was by car. Going from the great outdoors to tighter congested cities, museums, cathedrals and scenic congested old streets, meant a lot more switching to the wide end.

We did a trip to Switzerland, lots of getting around by train, then a Rhine cruise. My impression is that something like that, Germany with old cities, and serious mountains could be similar to New Zealand. Switzerland, all 28-200. The river cruise and side day excursions in "Old Cities," etc., lots of swapping.
I added a 20-70/4 and a 14mm prime, expecting more convenient as in less swapping on the old city side of things.

Neither the 20-70/4 nor the2x-200s are likely to cover all the wide, all the time for me. But might? Hence the 14/4. 20-200 is very convenient and could be a single lens answer. Don't know it nor New Zealand to say for sure.

So, one lens, ultra convenient, 20-200. 2 lenses? 16-35 or 17-28 and 25/28-200. Maybe less juggling? 20-70/4, 2x-200. and wider. With the 20-70, maybe the 50-300 and a wide.




Feb 04, 2026 at 09:02 PM
bmike-vt
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Family trip? Lens or lenses that are easy to use and 'get out of the way' so you can make some images when the opportunity arrises.

Photo trip? Lenses, bodies, tripods, star trackers, etc.

Family trip with carve out time for photos / locations? Bring the gear for that site / image you want to capture.

Your itinerary makes me exhausted. I haven't been to NZ, but I'm much more of a 'pick a couple-few places and dig in for a longer time. But maybe you and the family really like packing / unpacking / moving to a new location / etc.



Feb 05, 2026 at 01:36 AM
sandy27000
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Another vote for 24, 40 and 85 combo. I have 24 GM, 50 1.2 GM and 85 GM, and take all the three for family trips. 28-70 f2 and 50-150 f2 (have them for my daughters senior year school events) tend to get left behind due to weight of the individual lenses. Have never been to New Zealand but there may be a case for a 16mm f1.8G prime for your trip given the sweeping landscapes NZ offers. That’s the next prime to buy on my list.


Feb 05, 2026 at 06:03 AM
JD07
Online
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


As has already been said, what lenses you should take depends on a lot of factors which are personal to you. I will tell you what I'd take but obviously what I'd take may not work at all for you.

For context, I live in Australia but my wife is from NZ and I have gone there frequently over the years. I have done a number of the longer (multiday) hikes there, I've been to places like Queenstown and Doubtful Sound, etc, as well as some of the cities. I have several large prints hanging up at home which were taken in NZ.

Personally, the first lens in my bag would be a standard zoom of some sort. I use a 24-70mm f/2.8 now but obviously there are other options such as 20-70/4, 24-105/4, even 20-200 these days. When I had a DSLR I used a 24-70/4 quite a lot, including for longer hikes. If the size and weight isn't an issue though, I do prefer having f/2.8 available.

Second lens in my bag would be a telephoto zoom, eg 70-180/200 (I currently have a Tamron 70-180/2.8) or 50-300/400. That assumes I didn't go with a 20-200mm to cover the standard zoom spot.

If I left it at that, that would be fine. However, I'd usually take a relatively fast 35mm or similar as well, for low light, and for shallow depth of field, shots.

And if I took another lens, it would be a relatively small and light ultra wide angle lens of some sort.

I know you've said you prefer primes, but especially if I'm travelling with family, I need to be able to take photos relatively quickly, not be messing around with lens changes too often, so I would want a zoom or two with me. But as I said, what I'd take may not work for you.

Have a great time in NZ, whatever gear you take!

Edited on Feb 05, 2026 at 11:03 AM · View previous versions



Feb 05, 2026 at 06:33 AM
DTFagus
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Hey folks,

Great advice and thanks so much for sharing your perspectives! Much appreciated

A few more bits of context:

  1. I usually don't shood wide. I don't really know why. The wide end never felt good on me. the 24mm makes perhaps 5% of my photos. But then again I never was a landscape photographer, so I am considering playing around with the wide end more!
  2. The vacation has a bit of a double duty role - we are also considering relocating to NZ. So we balance "living like a local" with sightseeing with making the trip worthwhile for the kids (and ideally show them that this country has a lot to offer). It won't be relaxing, we are aware of that :/
  3. I remember a vacation in Menorca some years back where I had a 16-35 F4 and the 40 1.2, and I did not put the zoom on once.


That said, I am strongly considering now adding a 25-200 or 20-200 into the lineup (either for the 24gm or 85). Some more research to do...



Feb 05, 2026 at 06:34 AM
DWOfPaul
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


DTFagus wrote:
That said, I am strongly considering now adding a 25-200 or 20-200 into the lineup (either for the 24gm or 85). Some more research to do...


IDK if I would replace the 24 or 85. The 25-200 is basically an f5.6 zoom, and the 20-200 is basically a f6.3 zoom. The primes are going to be much better in low light and shallow depth of field. Also, if you find out you don't like the zoom while on the trip, you can just revert back to the primes you know you like. If you were adding a faster zoom like the 35-150 f2-2.8 then I would find it a much harder debate to bring all 4 along, due to size, weight, and closer apertures.



Feb 05, 2026 at 12:11 PM
RacingManiac
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · New Zealand family trip - sanity check on lens selection


Fortunate enough back in 2024 to have gone to NZ for work and travel for about a month, went to both North and South Island. I too brought a bag of Primes. But that seems to be how I travel in general. . IIRC I had 24GM, 40G, Sigma 85 1.4, and I still brought my 70-200 GII(and its 1.4x TC) in my separate luggage since I had the room.

You want something wide I feel like in a lot of places in NZ. It always seems like there are a lot of things to include in the scene, but even shooting tighter at 40 still looks amazing at times(I sometimes just stitch panorama together everywhere I go(with 40 or even 85 sometimes...)
https://photos.app.goo.gl/9G8N3zvJ1ssf9YMU7

I also recommend having a tripod. I've never shot Astro really before in my life but I got a lot of night shooting because how dark the sky is in a lot of places. 24GM is kinda on the limit on how tight you want it to be. I wish I had wider lens on hand.
https://pbase.com/racingmaniac/24gm




Feb 05, 2026 at 02:42 PM
       2       end






FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account