freaklikeme Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.5 #1 · MF as a travel camera | |
Andrew CD wrote:
True enough. 30mm, for instance, does seem odd, from a 135 perspective. Having said that, there's arguably nothing inherently special about 35mm or 50mm, as opposed to, say, 40mm or 55mm.
I'm trying to resist the temptation to buy anything new at the moment, but I have also been thinking quite carefully about what focal lengths are most useful for me. More specifically, I have had a thorough look through my photo library. Two or three focal length ranges stand out: 28-35mm and around 75mm (often cropped slightly) in particular. I also rather like 21mm. There is lots of 50mm too, of course, as well as telephoto stuff, but, for travel and mountains, 28-35 and 75+ predominate.
So, in Hasselblad terms, the 38V and, secondarily, the 90V are obvious choices, with the 75P and 28P or 25V as further options. I realise that the 55V is a strong contender too, and @flash@ has spoken very favourably about it, but I'm pretty sure that the 38V would suit me better. And, if I do pull the trigger, I am determined to limit myself to no more than two lenses for the foreseeable future. Sound reasonable?...Show more →
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I sort of fell backwards into the 907x 100c, picking it up in trade thinking I'd use the back more than the complete camera, and it changed my mind. I thought I'd go with a two lens kit as well (30/3.5 and 90/2.5) but the size, weight, low cost of entry, and fantastic landscape capabilities of the 45P won me over, so now it's three. We don't have the same goals with MF, since the 907x is strictly a landscaper for me, but my guy, Rolf, is investigating making the X2DII his digital camera, and he's renting one along with the 38V (to match our existing 55 and 90 Vs). He thinks it may be the right all-around solution.
|