fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              6              end
  

Any Nikon and Sony shooter?

  
 
Outstanding
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #1 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


3catsinky wrote:
yep, had no interest, and i am not giving it away, it's too good. I'll just keep it. I can match them nearly identical.


The used camera market is really tough right now.

It's a great time to buy used.

Same story for Sony bodies and GM lenses.



Jan 16, 2026 at 05:58 PM
3catsinky
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.7 #2 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


I just sold one of my A7CIIs for a good price, and got an A7V. Absolutely love it. Color SOC matches the Nikon, in terms of not needing much editing i did a food shoot with it and found I really didn't need to edit the photos at all, it's that good.


Jan 17, 2026 at 06:45 AM
m.sommers00
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #3 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


My very limited experience with Sony bodies has boiled down to ergonomics, Nikon has always just felt 'right' in the hand though the D850 vs. Z8 is better still.

I don't have any Z glass, still plugging away with my 2.8Gs. I'm very intrigued by using Sony glass on the Z8 though, especially if AF accuracy and speed differences are negligible.



Jan 17, 2026 at 10:19 AM
DenverSteve
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #4 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


I've shot Sony for over a decade. I've shot Nikon off and on for over 30 years and I shoot Leica - depending on the work and results needed. Unfortunately, half your responses are from people who state they don't shoot one of the two you asked about........??

Sony is fantastic, smaller, lighter and excellent glass especially the upper tier of lenses. Ditto for the Z8. Your questions require splitting hairs to answer. If pressed from a statistical data perspective I believe the Z8 holds the gold-standard for fast, accurate focus. It also has far more customization than anything I've shot in years. Far more than I care to use. You won't go wrong with either and I suggest they are so close that you/anyone should compare the ergonomics and see which one feels the best. I love the Z8 but it's a tool I use for specific work but it's bigger and heavier than the Sony. If size and weight matter then Sony wins. If a larger native grip matters, and/or you have big hands and don't mind the extra Nikon weight then the Z8 really can't be beat. There's no bad choice.

Edited on Jan 17, 2026 at 06:22 PM · View previous versions



Jan 17, 2026 at 04:18 PM
kalani_kane
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #5 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


I also came into Sony way back with the NEX 5n while growing up shooting only Nikon film, then the D200 since launch. The size advantages quickly made the NEX 5n my EDC and travel setup and the D200 collected dust. I now have the ultra-tiny RX0 ii for surfing, and the RX1R III for an EDC. I considered the A1 at launch, but physically could not hold it comfortably, especially with thick winter layered gloves and super tele lenses, so ultimately rented a Nikon z9, found that far too heavy, and settled on a z8. Spec wise, the A1 ii feels superior, especially with pre-capture RAW and 30fps vs. pre-capture JPG and 20fps, and perhaps AF goes to Sony, but for wildlife I think it's fine and the super tele primes are exciting. I'm eagerly awaiting a z8 ii, though, and hope for a GM 400-800 equivalent S-line Z.


Jan 17, 2026 at 05:10 PM
ahinesdesign
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #6 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


GiovanniAprea wrote:
Just wondering, not comparing MP which I partially care, how would you rate, if you shoot both, a Z8 and an A7IV (guess nobody yet used the A7V), I know Sony's AF is a step or more above, I love my Z8 and the few primes I own but always curious about the other side of the river.

Thank you


After more than nine years, my employer finally ponied up for a work camera so that I don't have to use my personal gear... an A7V, no less. Been shooting it for a couple of weeks, and feel like I can give an early assessment compared to my Z9.

I'll say right off the bat, Sony's AF isn't better than Nikon. If anything, they are on par, just with some different strengths and weaknesses for each system. It should go without saying — but this is the internet, so I'm gonna say it anyway lest I be attacked — fully understanding the AF modes and options will determine if you get the most out of either system.

At this point in time, I find the Sony to give me more false positives than Nikon in challenging lighting. And when it misses, it really misses the mark. Sony also tends to pick faces/eyes that I don't want, such as people far away in the background, instead of a subject close and far larger in the frame... On the positive side, the A7V will quickly focus in extremely dark conditions, far faster than the Z9; although accuracy is not always the best, it does achieve decent focus in such conditions more often than the Z9, even with star light mode enabled. I don't have perfectly equivalent lenses for each system, so this may be a lens issue more than body issue; more testing will be done as time goes on.

In good light, there's no discernible difference in AF accuracy / hit rate.

I might give a nod to Sony for better dynamic range in mechanical shutter mode at lower ISOs, but otherwise (A7V in electronic shutter mode), image quality is very similar. At very high ISO, both are very noisy, yet clean up nicely in post. I find both cameras to err on the warmer side with auto WB, although the Sony by a little less. Full A7V RAW support is not yet available in Lightroom (nor with my preferred color profile system) but I don't see anything on the editing side that makes either camera a clear winner; both deliver superb image quality.

Ergonomically, the Z9 is just simply better. The A7V feels tiny; the grip is markedly different and not nearly as comfortable to hold. It has taken quite a bit of time for me to get used to the more cramped layout on the A7V. I disabled several buttons because I kept pressing them by accident (same for the Z9, just in very different locations). The menu differences are maddening, no other way to say it.

Bottom line is that both cameras are super capable. I'm quite shocked at how close the performance of the A7V is to the much pricier Z9, though the price difference is far smaller if comparing the Z8. Both systems have a lot of great glass available, so it largely comes down to which option you think feels best in hand and who has specialty lenses that you might want to utilize. Yes, you can adapt Sony lenses to Nikon, but there are still caveats to work around and issues with wide/ultra wide lenses...



Jan 29, 2026 at 12:59 AM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

philip_pj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.7 #7 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


I'd never heard of a 'Z9', so looked it up so as to provide some facts, because factual material works so well, leaving readers to decide what they are looking for. Our cameras cover such a broad spectrum.

A Z9 weighs in at 1340 grams according to my sources. The a7rV is 723 grams, with both cameras holding cards and batteries. The Z9 is also down all of one stop of dynamic range from ISO 100 to ISO 400, and that is large. It's behind my 2014 a7II (the lowest DR Sony I have).

You might have more productively stated you need a fast and accurate AF and a huge body as primary criteria. Very few travel / landscape / street / found portraits photographers are going to want a Z9 at any price. Sony has more direct competitors to a Z9, no? You might have said so, to present a more balanced assessment.

Sony's overarching camera philosophy is to make small, reliable and very effective 'Leica-like' mirrorless cameras, from back when they introduced full frame mirrorless to the market. Not being afraid of competition, they opened the mount and encouraged all and sundry to make lenses for E.

I can do all travel with two bodies for the weight and bulk of one Z9, and carry fabulous MF lenses for use on them. And imagine, if you will, having that giant Z9 thing pointed at you on the street - not very people-friendly. It's just not a goer for so many important photographic genres.

Not a possibility, just so unsuitable for the things that matter to image quality. Yours is a sliver-thin genre, it seems. You might have missed it, but the entire imaging world is moving towards small cameras and lenses right now, cine video and stills - all.

Looked up the Z8 too: same DR shortfall from Sony, and a DSLR weight class of 910 grams - almost 200g heavier. It seem large cameras are in Nikon's DNA, as a genetic miscode in the modern world.

Millions of people use Sony cameras daily, and have no trouble with the issues you raise. See their market share for evidence.

You might have a hand problem, some do struggle with camera operation if their hands are inflexible or strange in an extreme way. I take XL gloves and find the Sonys very nice to use - all of them I've picked up. cheers, I hope you get to like the (free) Sony. You probably think it is worth what you paid for it.



Jan 29, 2026 at 08:13 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #8 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


I don’t think anyone needs 9 paragraphs from someone who had to google the camera and hasn’t heard of the flagship of one of the largest imaging companies in the world.


Jan 29, 2026 at 08:27 PM
cvrle59
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #9 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


I don't know if it means anything, but I find very interesting, how Nikon action cameras compare to Sony, regardless the size and weight.
The number of reviews at two largest US photography stores.
There is some serious disproportion here, and there is no way, these numbers are meaningless. They must be reflecting number of units sold, somehow.
Z8 and Z9 must be very popular among sports and wildlife shooters, or Nikon crowd is just so crazy about writing reviews on those sites 😐

BH Photo
Z8 - 373
Z9 - 324
A1 - 191
A1II - 68
A9III - 26

Adorama
Z8 - 363
Z9 - 313
A1 - 61
A1II - 15
A9III - 13

The numbers don't lie..



Jan 29, 2026 at 08:55 PM
ahinesdesign
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #10 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


philip_pj wrote:
I'd never heard of a 'Z9', so looked it up so as to provide some facts, because factual material works so well, leaving readers to decide what they are looking for. Our cameras cover such a broad spectrum.

A Z9 weighs in at 1340 grams according to my sources. The a7rV is 723 grams, with both cameras holding cards and batteries. The Z9 is also down all of one stop of dynamic range from ISO 100 to ISO 400, and that is large. It's behind my 2014 a7II (the lowest DR Sony I have).

You might have more productively stated you need
...Show more

Is your response meant to be satire or some other kind of humor? Never heard of the Z9? Hands that are "strange in an extreme way?"

Bottom line is each of us has the freedom to prefer whatever camera(s) we find help us to create the images we want to make. Camera size, market share, preferred genres, other photographers' opinions, nor the condition of one's hands should not be a source of judgement against someone else's choices that differ from our own.

Edited on Feb 17, 2026 at 11:01 PM · View previous versions



Jan 29, 2026 at 10:00 PM
Maxxus46
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #11 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


old-gregg wrote:
@GiovanniAprea@@@ Focusing is a wash between the two platforms IMO. Comparing the Z8 and the A1 II, the Sony is "grabbier" but just a little. Testing is one thing, but in practice I feel like I get the same % of keepers with both. Meanwhile, the Z8 is far better for manual focus. That said, E-mount glass is a much better reason to look at Sony IMO, all you need is Megadap.


100% agree with you as a former Sony shooter of 7 years ) last camera from Sony I owned was the A1). I'm now shooting a Z8/Z9 and actually prefer them over Sony. The ergonomics are better (FOR ME), build quality is superior, the AF? Close enough that it doesnt matter. The file quality, color accuracy/depth? Nikon color science is still my favorite of all brands. Lenses? Nikon...I prefer their telephoto options. This debate will not end in this thread, and I expect to see specific individuals post their negative comments about Nikon here, since FM is a heavily biased Sony forum (and largely unmoderated). And here is the reality check, ANY of the big three cameras will net you pretty much the same images , differences will be subtle at best. You can spend all day defending your gear choices here and it won't make any difference in your skill as a photographer. Pick a brand that you like, get out there and use it, and move on. These threads are getting old, boring and of little value for any experienced photographers who know better.



Jan 30, 2026 at 11:02 AM
DWOfPaul
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.7 #12 · Any Nikon and Sony shooter?


philip_pj wrote:
I'd never heard of a 'Z9', so looked it up so as to provide some facts, because factual material works so well, leaving readers to decide what they are looking for. Our cameras cover such a broad spectrum.

A Z9 weighs in at 1340 grams according to my sources. The a7rV is 723 grams, with both cameras holding cards and batteries. The Z9 is also down all of one stop of dynamic range from ISO 100 to ISO 400, and that is large. It's behind my 2014 a7II (the lowest DR Sony I have).

You might have more productively stated you need
...Show more

As someone who uses Nikon and Sony gear side by side, usually my Z8 and a7rIV, it's more nuanced than simple specs. Especially if you are just learning about the Z9.

For example, sure, sometimes I do enjoy the smaller size of my a7rIV, but the Z8 feels better in my hand, has light up buttons which are great at night, has a top display which is very convenient, and has more buttons for switching settings I commonly change. So the larger camera size gains you some features, too.

As for dynamic range, an important thing to keep in mind is that the a7V and Z9 have very similar dynamic range when using the electronic shutter, which ahinesdesign pointed out. So you only get the dynamic range advantage if you are taking photos at low iso and less then 10fps. If you are taking a video, high ISO, or using high FPS, you basically lose the dynamic range advantage.

At the end of the day, if one camera system completely dominated the rest, most of these conversations would end as most of us would all be using the same brand.



Jan 30, 2026 at 11:50 AM
1       2       3              6              end






FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              6              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account