Nice find here brother and well captured! I think more snow is headed your way so pretty soon it'll be more than a dusting.
Here's a thought. Those beautiful leaded glass windows on the front doors might make a great entry for this month's assignment.
Brent
Nice looking old structure, Dan, any idea of its birthdate? Looks like it's worthy of updating beyond the roof. Is that a third chimney in back? Quartering shot please?
Douglas
bnfotografie wrote:
Nice find here brother and well captured! I think more snow is headed your way so pretty soon it'll be more than a dusting.
Here's a thought. Those beautiful leaded glass windows on the front doors might make a great entry for this month's assignment.
Brent
I thought about that also Brent. I have a few others in mind also. The closer you get to the doors the uglier they get! Even zooming in on them starts to show the cracks, mold and major disrepair!
A fellow member advised me to increase the size of my postings. I did that on the Fuji forum post.
We missed the snow here. Brutally cold but I love cold!
Thanks brother!
Dan
Danpbphoto wrote:
A fellow member advised me to increase the size of my postings. I did that on the Fuji forum post.
We missed the snow here. Brutally cold but I love cold!
Thanks brother!
Dan
What size are you making your vertical format posts now? I've always done 875 pixels high.
Brent
bnfotografie wrote:
Nice find here brother and well captured! I think more snow is headed your way so pretty soon it'll be more than a dusting.
Here's a thought. Those beautiful leaded glass windows on the front doors might make a great entry for this month's assignment.
Brent
Thanks brother for the suggestion!
Appreciate it!
Dan
Jack Flesher wrote:
Just FWIW -- retina-style displays like at least 2048 px on the long side.
Thanks Jack! I will admit I "got hung up on" no more than 900px long side. Then a member told me to try 2200px long side.
I did and yes it does make a big difference in the resolution. I like that.
My 30" NEC SpectraView MultiSync LCD is my editing monitor.
Dan
bnfotografie wrote:
That's what I do for horizontals but with verticals it seems to make them too large. For example, the image below is 2480 on the long side.
Brent
Like I said Brent..IT IS BIG!!!!
I was worried that some members would tell me to "downsize" because it doesn't fit on the monitor screen properly.
Now this has a great impact when viewing the snow! Wow!! Reminds me of Iowa very much.
Thanks for all your suggestions.
Dan
Danpbphoto wrote:
Like I said Brent..IT IS BIG!!!!
I was worried that some members would tell me to "downsize" because it doesn't fit on the monitor screen properly.
Now this has a great impact when viewing the snow! Wow!! Reminds me of Iowa very much.
Thanks for all your suggestions.
Dan
I don't really understand the sizing here. I've been sizing my horizontal images at 1300 pixels on the long side, 300 ppi. When I go larger, they don't fit. I just downloaded someone else's photo here to check the size, and it was 4000 by 3000 pixels at 360 ppi--and it fit the screen just fine. I tried posting one at that size and it was rejected.
Brent
bnfotografie wrote:
I don't really understand the sizing here. I've been sizing my horizontal images at 1300 pixels on the long side, 300 ppi. When I go larger, they don't fit. I just downloaded someone else's photo here to check the size, and it was 4000 by 3000 pixels at 360 ppi--and it fit the screen just fine. I tried posting one at that size and it was rejected.
Brent
I "had" always sized my posted images at 800 long side- 72-300px range in Resolution. Why? I think it stemmed from "something I read about "resizing an image to post years ago or Fred's WA/MA Assignment Rule(??)".. I made the sizing of my image nothing more than a personal preference based on nothing really.
A fellow member ask "why I was posting so small an image size?" I had no real answer. I am AMAZED at how much more I see in a larger sized image BUT it isnot all on the screen to view which I do prefer.
