fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Film Is Not Dead Forum | Join Upload & Sell

  

Unexpected 35mm Results

  
 
bwcolor
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Unexpected 35mm Results


I have approached film with the assumption that it was an inferior technology. So, to mitigate this I maximized the fidelity and resolution of my digital copies and concentrated on shooting higher resolving film stock and utilizing larger format negatives. With all that said, I wanted to put up an image from my Nashville trip in my two channel music room, but on that trip I only shot 35mm. I ordered a 30”x40” stretched canvas print from MPIX and I’m shocked at the quality of this image on such a large print. Of course, canvas isn’t a high resolution surface, but I no longer view film as an inferior technology..just different.

0825 Leica M3 90mm Macro-Elmar Ektar 100-1 by gary, on Flickr





Edited on Nov 28, 2025 at 07:31 PM · View previous versions


Nov 28, 2025 at 06:54 PM
Geoff D F
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Unexpected 35mm Results


Film is an older technology. I don't think older necessarily equates to inferior. It might be reasonable to compare it to digital on a technical level, but not on an aesthstic level which is ultmiately subjective.


Nov 28, 2025 at 07:06 PM
burchyk
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Unexpected 35mm Results


This looks nice!

Beyond a certain point adding more resolution does not really make a photo "better".



Nov 28, 2025 at 07:12 PM
James Markus
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · Unexpected 35mm Results


My guess is that they use a RIP, or modern equivalent. It rasters the file to a grid so it can maintain quality when up-rez'd. (Made larger)


Nov 29, 2025 at 10:22 AM







FM Forums | Film Is Not Dead Forum | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account