p.3 #1 · Countless prime lenses, why no F4/F5.6 telephoto primes?
keepcoding wrote:
Well, the 100-400/4 may be able to replace the primes regarding focal length and aperture, but it will be much heavier and probably won't be on the same level of image quality.
About the 300/4 Nikon: maybe my info is wrong, but on the Nikon website it says 755g, which is barely heavier than the Tamron 50-300mm (665g).
We will see where the 100-400/4GM lands eventually I guess.