fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
  

Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy

  
 
John Wheeler
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


ruthenium wrote:
John, my concern about "a color managed and wide gamut profile such as the DCI-P3 profile" is that it has the white point and gamma different from those of the sRGB or Display-P3 profiles.
My understanding is that Display-P3 and DCI-P3 profiles have the same gamut but the former is different by having the white point and gamma the same as sRGB. It is for this reason, I suggested the OP to have a look at the built-in Display-P3 profile and specifically see whether this should give colors the same or acceptably close to the colors of the profile obtained
...Show more

I agree that using the Display P3 profile would be even better. I did not see that was an option so I may have overlooked that. The Display P3 is also the standard for Apple.

If in a color managed workflow (which is not totally verified by the OP), the gamma would not make any difference as Color Mangement adjusts for different gammas. Color Management is also supposed to adjust the viewing experience to compensate for different White Points as well (yet I have not tested that persoanlly)

One factor in all of this that has not been fully discussed in this thread is the difference between calibration and color profiles/profiling. For color profiles to be accurate, the settings of the monitor need to be at the same settings as when the profiling was done. The biggest example is the display lumens/m^2. Having it set to high in brightness causes editing to create an image that will be dark on a standard calibrated display even with color management.

As I said in my prior posts, I am not too familiar with Windows Color Management other than I am glad I don't have to figure it out.




Aug 18, 2025 at 11:45 AM
nibunnoichi
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


ruthenium wrote:
To me, the safest and most reasonable choice of the four options is Display-P3.
I expect you have experimented with all these profiles. How did you like the colors with the Display-P3 profile compared to the "Native" (Default Vivid colors)? Do you see the colors with the built-in Display-P3 profile being visibly different from the colors of the calibrated profile? If not considerably different, then these two might be your best reference for correct colors.
I think the principal questions is what you can trust. Can you trust your own perception of colors?


Made another round of calibrations and some new observations.

If turns out that it does not matter what profile I chose from the Asus apps as a "starting point". The Calibrite process always *resets* the system to the "sRGB IEC61966-2" profile prior to starting its brightness and RGB measurements, prior to the calibration process.

In any case, I have a new profile from today, which again slightly varies (what I perceive) from the resultant profiles from previous runs.

At this point, I'll give it ago and stay on this calibrated profile for a while, and see how I like it.

I'm not sure I like ANY of profiles (built-in or calibrated) so far on this laptop, just because I've been so used to the blue-biased profile I've been working with from my LCD monitor. But I'm willing to also apply a calibrated profile to the LCD as well, and see if the results grows on me over time.

My ultimate judging guideline is how my edited photos look from now on, from my phone's screen, since for better or worse, that is the screen I spend most of my time viewing my photos on (as well as showing others).







Aug 18, 2025 at 05:01 PM
nibunnoichi
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


John Wheeler wrote:
If in a color managed workflow (which is not totally verified by the OP)...




This begs the question: What is a the definitive & comprehensive list of items/checks/settings/procedures/etc I need provide or follow to constitute, without a shadow of a doubt, admissible in a court of law, agreed-upon by a jury of 12, a "color managed workflow" ?

Because so far, prior to this laptop, my photography workflow (in relation to colors) has been something like:
1) Setting the camera's color space to Adobe RGB
2) Shoot in RAW.
3) Edits in Lightroom in ProPhoto RGB (no choice either way), admittedly on an uncalibrated LCD until now.
4) Exported to Photoshop in ProPhoto RGB
5) Edits in photoshop in the ProPhoto RGB workspace.
6) Exported from Lightroom with output Color Space = sRGB

What else?



Aug 18, 2025 at 05:24 PM
EB-1
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


If you shoot in the RAW (2), then the camera colorspace (1) is unimportant.

EBH



Aug 18, 2025 at 06:49 PM
ruthenium
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #5 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


I believe that your lines 1 to 6 have little to do with a color managed workflow.
I would say that a color managed workflow is capable of returning a color-consistent output.
A simple example: buy a ColorChecker, take a photo of this, process the raw file, export as jpeg (or tiff), finally display or print the image. If the product should look reasonably close to the original, then your workflow is color-consistent. This means that not only your display is set to reproduce the colors correctly, but also that the WB was correctly set, and your raw converter is not heavily biased in some ways.
There is no requirement that all your photos must look true to life. You do have all of the artistic freedom, and if you like your greens to have more blue, this is fine as long as you are happy about the output. However, this effect should be part of your processing in Lr or Ps, used deliberately when wanted. It would be incorrect to adjust your monitor colors for the same (permanent) effect.
A definition from Co-pilot AI is quite reasonable:
"A color-managed workflow in photography refers to a systematic approach to ensuring consistent and accurate color reproduction across all stages of image creation—from capture to editing to output. It’s like having a translator that makes sure your colors speak the same language across devices."



Aug 18, 2025 at 11:39 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

John Wheeler
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


nibunnoichi wrote:
This begs the question: What is a the definitive & comprehensive list of items/checks/settings/procedures/etc I need provide or follow to constitute, without a shadow of a doubt, admissible in a court of law, agreed-upon by a jury of 12, a "color managed workflow" ?

Because so far, prior to this laptop, my photography workflow (in relation to colors) has been something like:
1) Setting the camera's color space to Adobe RGB
2) Shoot in RAW.
3) Edits in Lightroom in ProPhoto RGB (no choice either way), admittedly on an uncalibrated LCD until now.
4) Exported to Photoshop in ProPhoto RGB
5) Edits in photoshop in
...Show more

I hope you did not take my post as offense, and I hope it did not create frustration, as I think you are doing most of the things to have color represented quite well in your workflow.

First, here is a good and pretty easy-to-read tutorial on color management that might be helpful:

https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/color-management-printing.htm

One thing that helped me better understand Color Managed Workflows is that each Color Space (Color Profile) whether it is an editing color space or a device color space, uses different RGB color numbers in each one. Typically the larger gamut color spaces use smaller color numbers to represent the same visual color. So each color space/profile is its own color scale.

One of the key jobs of Color Management is to convert/translate those color numbers every time you move from one space to another space to preserve the same visual color best. It some respects, Color Management is analogous to a universal translator so each editing space/device space will have the correct numbers to reproduce the desired color best.

Given that description, here are the things that are needed to have good color management (i.e., Color Managed Workflow)
1) You need to use software that is color managed (i.e., uses the universal translator)

2) Each device needs to have an accurate color space representation. The universal translator needs to know the language it is translating. That means devices that are calibrated and profiled by you, or you are provided the color profile and use the color profile for that device

3) The universal translator needs ot know the color space (language) that the incoming image is set to. It won't know unless you embed/attach the color profile into the image. If you don't, the translator will be guessing on the color space for that image. The analogy is this. If someone tells you it is 25 degrees outside, you don't know how to dress for the weather unless you are also told which temperature scale is being used. If you don't know if it is Fahrenheit or Celsius, then you might dress the wrong way.

4) When a color profile is created for a device such as a monitor, it is created with a screen luminosity at some level. The color profile is actually only valid for that screen luminosity. To have the desired tone to match properly on a variety of devices. Before creating a profile, technically it is called calibration to put the device into a known condition (e.g, brightness, contrast, RGB settings, etc depending on all the options the monitor allows.).

So in simple terms, a universal translator needs to be used (Color Managed software), you need to know which language you are translating from (the color space of the incoming image from its embedded color space profile), and the language to which you are translating (the color space/profile of the target device)

Note that all the OS settings for Color Management is to make sure the universal translator is set up right. If the settings are wrong, the universal translator (color management) will be wrong.

Lightroom is color managed, and to the first order, so is Photoshop. (PS settings need to be correct under Edit > Color Settings).

Images need their color space to be embedded. I am pretty sure Lightroom does not give you a choice and embeds a profile. In Photoshop, there are options when you save images, whether you should attach the color space - you should attach/embed the color space.

Note, there is software that is not color managed. Some photo viewers are not, and some browsers are not color managed.

So, to the first order, I think that is it.

Less critical, there are second-order factors in color management that I will not give details.

Wider gamut color spaces have colors that cannot be represented in smaller color spaces; there are choices on how that should be handled. Those options are called rendering intents.

Some color spaces have different absolute black levels. There is a choice in management called "Black Point Compensation"

To get some sense of how the image will look in a different color space, that process is called "soft proofing," which both Lightroom and Photoshop support.

------------------------

So in your case, a lot of your actions are in line with a Color Managed Workflow. I hope the above higher-level description is more helpful rather than confusing.






Aug 19, 2025 at 12:50 PM
nibunnoichi
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


ruthenium wrote:
I would say that a color managed workflow is capable of returning a color-consistent output.
A simple example: buy a ColorChecker, take a photo of this, process the raw file, export as jpeg (or tiff), finally display or print the image. If the product should look reasonably close to the original, then your workflow is color-consistent...

... It would be incorrect to adjust your monitor colors for the same (permanent) effect.

A definition from Co-pilot AI is quite reasonable:
"A color-managed workflow in photography refers to a systematic approach to ensuring consistent and accurate color reproduction across all stages of image creation—from
...Show more

I can accept that description of a "color managed workflow", but it does leave wiggle room for details of implementation within the workflow.

In one sense, my workflow over the years has been very consistent, following my steps 1-6 as I presented above. But the X-factor (and the elephant-in-the-room) in this description is the final output - which in my case has been outputting for viewing on screens - monitors, TVs, and especially phones.

For whatever reason, most screens (now I'm scrutinizing this topic) come out-of-the-box with a blue "look". I've calibrated multiple LCDs monitors in my house by now, of various brands and ages, and I've tried to reset them to their "Factory settings" prior to calibration, and they all look very blue, compared to the calibrated result. So I didn't specifically *adjust* my monitor to be blue - it came like that. I've also discovered many reports online of users also noticing a green shift after calibration, so I think this is almost a universal quirk.

So I've edited all these years with the factory-default of a blue tint on my monitor, and it's been fine, because the output will also be viewed on screens with varying degrees of a blue tint - phone screens in particular. I can't go about calibrating phone screens, and I certainly can't tell my friends (or anyone who would browse my web gallery) to say "hey, make sure you spend $270 and calibrate your screen before you look at my photos".

Is there something I'm missing with this line of reasoning?



Aug 19, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Taperwing
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #8 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


First, it is difficult to know if an image personally captured is 'color correct' or not. While one's perception of color is tied to personal bias, a more rigorous starting definition would be that items that are color neutral in real life, say an 18% gray card, would measure as having the same Red, Green and Blue values when the captured file is evaluated in a program such as Photoshop. You can step up from there by taking an image with a color checker in the scene. That is not to say, a 'color correct' image would show as perfectly neutral on a monitor. I could take the very same file, and look at it on three different monitors, which may vary in either color temperature preset, or calibration, and none would match.

One thing that I have learned from dabbling in color printing, is that it is quite helpful to have some reference images to both view and print. Bounce over to Keith Cooper's Northlight Images website and pull down a some of his sample images (https://www.northlight-images.co.uk/printer-test-images/) and see how they look on your setup. FWIW, there is now charge, unless you want to make a donation for his helpful content. He also provides full explanations in the text. While these are primarly printing related, they also work perfectly well for a basic monitor gut check.

While I often see monitors in the workplace that are set to a cool color balance, there is no reason it has to be this way. FWIW, my cheap 32" LG here at work has presets for Custom, Warm, Medium, Cool, or Custom. If you are not going to hardware calibrate, simply set it to taste and use a known image for finer adjustment. It has been too long to remember how it came, but it is now set to custom after calibrating. Most calibration software that I have used has both Simple and more Advanced calibration sequences. In the Advanced mode, the user adjusts brightness, contrast, and color balance too, if available, to bring the monitor as close to target as possible before calibrating and adjusting the LUT.

There are also some visual calibration tools for setting brightness, contrast and gamma, which are helpful.

You probably know this, but if you are working from raw files, your images will be in 16-bit color, which allow fare more lattitude for manipulation. Once they get distilled down to 8-bit, either by direct intention or saving as a JPEG, there is not going back. If you are finished editing the file, this is perfectly fine for many uses, although I recently ran into issues when trying to print an image with a fine sky gradation. When save as an JPEG (which are 8-bit, by definition), there was banding. The banding dissapeared when saving and printing from a 16-bit TIFF. Also, many modern browsers are color aware. You don't have to convert to sRGB. Phones are a different beast.



Aug 19, 2025 at 02:06 PM
nibunnoichi
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #9 · Asus ProArt P16 laptop: Lightroom exported JPG colors discrepancy


John Wheeler wrote:
I hope you did not take my post as offense, and I hope it did not create frustration, as I think you are doing most of the things to have color represented quite well in your workflow.


Hey John, no worries - I was just being cheeky rather than conveying frustration. My initial frustration (which you helped solved), was with Microsoft's decision to introduce this new "Automatically manage color for apps" option buried in Windows 11 Settings, which threw me for a loop. This new settings falls into your mention of "all the OS settings for Color Management is to make sure the universal translator is set up right."

I'll definitely have to revisit your post if and when I decide to go into printing my images, which I know is a huge (and expensive) can of worms that I've decided not to struggle through so far.

But I certainly did learn some new things from your post, such as:
- "Lightroom does not give you a choice and embeds a profile." (good to know)
- "The color profile is actually only valid for that screen luminosity." (This make sense, but I do think the screen is now too dark for general Viewing usage, so I'll have to decide if I want to constantly lower my monitor's brightness whenever I'm editing)




Aug 19, 2025 at 02:27 PM
1              end






FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account