fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2              end
  

Sony 50 GM 1.2, Zeiss Batis 40 2.0, Zeiss Loxia 50 2.0, Tamron 35-150 2....

  
 
Nifty Fifty
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #1 · Sony 50 GM 1.2, Zeiss Batis 40 2.0, Zeiss Loxia 50 2.0, Tamron 35-150 2.0-2.8 (+ Leica Q3 43) Portrait




Lukacs wrote:
I miss cheaper, smaller f1.2 AF lenses with less correction (for size and price cut).

Yes, I feel the same way. By the way, I just noticed that I often write "sharpness," but actually mean "resolution."



Jul 13, 2025 at 04:50 AM
Jonas B
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #2 · Sony 50 GM 1.2, Zeiss Batis 40 2.0, Zeiss Loxia 50 2.0, Tamron 35-150 2.0-2.8 (+ Leica Q3 43) Portrait


Lukacs wrote:
On 24-33MP the Voigtlander 40 1.2 and 50 1.2 is a perfect lens if you can live with MF. Stopped down to f4 excellent sharp, even at f2 is enough, and you have 1.2 background separation in small size. However on 60MP, I'd pick the APO line instead.


and a few posts later:

Also you don't need 60MP for those kind of lenses. You may use them on 60MP if you have a high resolution lens also. I had 50 1.2GM, best lens I ever owned, however I don't need 60MP resolution with an f1.2 lens, I miss cheaper, smaller f1.2 AF lenses with less correction (for size and price cut).


?
I don't think it matters much if you have a 33, 42, 50 or 60 MP sensor here. With the Voigtländer 40/1.2 and 50/1.2 you get what you get and the sensor resolution abilities doesn't matter much at f71.2-f71.6 (approximately) and perhaps also not at f/2.
Picking the APO instead, as mentioned above, will give you a totally other kind of image regardless of sensor used.
You also don't have to have a high resolution lens for having fun with any of the f/1.2 lenses set to large openings.

I think I understand the point you are trying to do, I just want to make some things less absolute sort of speaking.




Jul 14, 2025 at 10:50 AM
Jonas B
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #3 · Sony 50 GM 1.2, Zeiss Batis 40 2.0, Zeiss Loxia 50 2.0, Tamron 35-150 2.0-2.8 (+ Leica Q3 43) Portrait


Nifty Fifty wrote:
[...]By the way, I just noticed that I often write "sharpness," but actually mean "resolution."


When i write sharpness I am thinking of something undefined but usually seen by most people. Like in "Oh, what a sharp image". When writing resolution I think we really should specify what we mean. Perhaps something like "when measuring in the center at 40 lp/mm we get 60% contrast".
Yes, it's easier to write sharpness. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't mean anything at all (to me).



Jul 14, 2025 at 10:55 AM
35mmshooter
Offline

Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #4 · Sony 50 GM 1.2, Zeiss Batis 40 2.0, Zeiss Loxia 50 2.0, Tamron 35-150 2.0-2.8 (+ Leica Q3 43) Portrait


Blindly looking at the examples in the first post, I found the Zeiss Loxia and Batis to have the most distracting backgrounds. Although tbh, all these lenses are nice, there are no wrong choices.


Jul 26, 2025 at 11:01 AM
Nifty Fifty
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #5 · Sony 50 GM 1.2, Zeiss Batis 40 2.0, Zeiss Loxia 50 2.0, Tamron 35-150 2.0-2.8 (+ Leica Q3 43) Portrait


I noticed that the alleged 43mm of the Q3 is considerably wider than the 40mm of the Batis.


Jul 26, 2025 at 11:09 AM
1       2              end






FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account