fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       end
  

Archive 2025 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM

  
 
milend
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


Thank you everyone for the thoughtful feedback.

I think I've narrowed my choice down to 35GM vs the 24-50.

With the 35GM, I basically get 35mm F1.4 and 50mm F2 (at 1/2 the resolution). With the 24-50mm, I get the 24-35mm focal range which I cannot get with the 35mm.

I just don't know how often I'd need to go below 35mm vs how often I'd need F1.4 or whether F2.8 would be sufficient (if I'm willing to ignore the DoF and two more stops of noise).



Apr 07, 2025 at 11:16 AM
MARKFER
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


I have the 35GM and the 50 1.2GM. The 35GM is a great lens. I prefer it in some ways to the 50. The F1.4 is good and sharp and will give a look that the 2.8 won't. A look that I think you might end up liking if not needing.


Apr 08, 2025 at 10:50 AM
patotts
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


50 all the way. I have owned some of the best 35mm lenses out there, Leica Summilux 35/1.4 ASPH, Leica Summicron 35/2 ASPH, Sony 35/1.4 GM... I've really tried to love the 35mm focal length but it is just not wide enough if I want wide and certainly not compressed enough if I want to shoot portraits or more isloate a subject. But I know Chris Nicols and I are the outliers here ;-)

If you want to get a fast prime, I'd say get a minty used 50GM and you won't lose money if it doesn't work out.

My last thought would be to get a Tamron 90/2.8 III macro instead which doubles as a portrait lens, and it is so much fun to shoot close up of baby fingers, eye-lashes, baby hand in parent hand, etc. A 50 or 35 will be better suited as kids are getting older.



Apr 08, 2025 at 11:27 AM
vaptre
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


I've just got 35/1.4 after a year with my 24/1.4, 50/1.4 and 55/1.4 and 35/1.8. I tried to avoid this lens as much as I can. Because... Ha-ha! Why do I need it if I have all these lenses?! But! Very I got a very very interesting offer on used (in real life absolutely new, untouched, totally new) lens and I'm here!

And what I should say. Everyone who says that this lens is

- amazing
- astonishing
- blows out my mind
- incredible
- unbelievable
- ... etc

Everyone who says this is right! I must admit. It's something unbelievable in terms of sharpness, optical quality, bokeh. And... I'm out of my mind. Real gem! The whole story started like "great option, I'll buy it then resell" now looks completely different. Much difficult. A lot!

If I need to compare 35/1.4 with 24-50 I can't. It's like comparing soft with wet. (If I can say it in English). It's a complete perpendicular story. The only thing is the same is a focal length.

My opinion is that you need to have both lenses.

The next great lens in my kit is 24/1.4 because it's the best 24 in every system in term of quality and weight. The next is 55/1.8 because of its rendering multiplied on weight and usability. And the last one 50/1.4 which I personally don't like because it's a boring lens just a tiny bit better than 55/1.8. Nothing outstanding at all. I'm very upset that I got 50/1.4. 50/1.2 much much interesting.

But 35/1.4 is real something! Something totally unusual and unexpected.



Apr 10, 2025 at 02:39 AM
sonofjesse2010
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


35mm is just a good focal length. The GM is a very solid lens not crazy heavy/large. I sold the 35mm 1.8 and got the 1.4. It's a great lens. In a perfect world I just prefer primes mainly cause I have never seen a 1.4 Zoom lens I could carry around. Now if you never shoot moving things in darkness and always shoots groups 2.8 is ok. I like the flexibility of 1.4. A 1.4 can always stop down to 2.8, but a 2.8 can't open up to 1.4.

I remember older lenses I loved that you could NOT shoot wide open. When technology today most primes seen decent wide open in the center. The 35mmGM is great wide open in the center so no worries.

Also if you have like a7RV you can always put it in crop mode if you want to frame things closer to 50mm and that works in a pinch(I know I know I can crop later just saying its a cool option)



May 11, 2025 at 10:17 AM
old-gregg
Online
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


milend wrote:
My use case is simple - photos of my family (we have a newborn baby). I'm looking to add a fast prime and would love to hear from parents who went through the early years of their children - which focal lens worked best for them?


Thank you for specifying the use case. It makes a difference. As a freshly minted father of a 8-month old, my suggestion is to look at the 35mm f/1.4. I own the 50mm and the 24mm primes as well. In terms of usefulness, looking at focal lengths stats in my portfolio, they are ranked as:

1. 35mm
2. 24mm
3. 50mm

The 50mm is just too tight, unless you're fine with just a bunch of tight portraits which gets tiring quick. The rooms where our toddler hands out are quite spacious and yet I'm still backing against the walls if I want to include some context/background.

The 24mm is a very close competitor to the 35mm. My camera has a 61MP sensor and with this huge surplus of megapixels this lens easily doubles as a 24-35mm "zoom" and, depending on your composition skills you may want to prefer it. It still delivers a whopping 28MP in "35mm crop mode". Also, the 28mm POV truly shines when switching to 4:3 or 5:4 aspect ratio.

The 35mm is less challenging from a composition perspective, but less flexible than the 24mm, and being honest with my own assessment of my skills, tends to work better. Basically, it is less demanding from a skill perspective and gives you the cropped 50mm FOV at 30MP.

TLDR: I would recommend either a combo of 24+50mm or a single 35mm. And since you've asked for a single lens recommendation, 35mm it is.



May 12, 2025 at 11:24 AM
santoshvk
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


I had a similar usecase and that will continue as my kid continues to grow.
There is no right or wrong lens, and you might have to see your shooting style to figure how you can utilize it in the best manner.
The 35 GM is an excellent lens, though, I sold it to move to 24+50 1.4 GM combo in Sony, and have a X100VI 35mm to compliment this setup.



May 13, 2025 at 12:04 AM
chiron
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #8 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


milend wrote:
I need some advice regarding the 35mm and 50mm 1.4 GM lenses. My current lens lineup consists of:

- 24-70mm F2.8 GM2
- 40mm F2.5
- 24-50mm F2.8

The 24-50mm is my current favourite lens because it's relatively lightweight and it covers my most used focal lengths - 28mm, 35mm and 50mm. So it stays on my A7IV all the time.

I find the 40mm redundant because I bought it with the intention of having a lighter weight setup but the package is still not small and not much of a difference between the 24-50mm, so I never use this lens.

The 24-70 is too bulky,
...Show more

I have all the lenses you are considering and spend a lot of my photography time taking pictures of my three grandchildren who are 4 and 2 and 2 (twins). The lenses all work in different situations for different kinds of images and also for other photographic purposes like travel. I think the best I can do to help you decide is to tell you how each lens functions for me and let you notice whether any of those uses rings a bell for you.

The 25-50 is small and covers a lot of the range one wants when shooting families and children. The f2.8 is a slight limitation, but noise and post processing software, as long as you are comfortable with it, gives you the option of using it effectively even in dimly lit bedrooms. This is also a great travel lens.

The 24-70 is an outstanding lens, but it only adds a little to the 24-50 for child and family images. I use it sometimes when I feel like using the 70mm end for tighter portraits, but mostly I use it for landscapes, still lifes, architecture, sometimes for travel. I find its size a bit unhandy for family photography, but you could use it as a one-and-done lens, which is what it was designed to do.

The 35/1.4 GM is a great lens and it is an excellent focal length for family images because it lets you easily get a child's interaction with another person or with their environment. It is less useful during the first six months, but gets used more as the child gets more mobile and capable. The single focal length makes me concentrate on composition and framing better than a zoom does. The zoom seems to make it too easy to frame the shot, so composition gets neglected a bit with the zoom. The 35mm makes me think about what image I can get.

The 40/2.5 is one of my favorite lenses because it is small and pretty well does what both the 35 and the 50 can do. I use it for family, kids, travel and especially in situations where it is nice to be a non-intrusive photo-taker--it is so small and easy to overlook.

50mm has always been one of my favorite focal lengths and I have and use multiple 50mm lenses. They are great for portraits and for images of one or two people close together. I think of it often as a portrait lens with the wide aperture aiding subject isolation, and it is great for this purpose with babies and children. It has some limitations for indoors because you can't be far enough away to get everything you want and still have decent composition. Henri Cartier-Bresson used 50mm for most of his images, but most of those were taken outdoors. However, his 50mm portraits, mostly shot indoors, are wonderful.

My last thought is to encourage you to try some of your images in B&W. It eliminates the color-clutter of so many documentary and candid pictures and emphasizes the people who are in the images as their faces and skin tones usually are one of the largest tonal objects in the image, and it removes distractions.

So, I don't know which lenses you should choose to own, but maybe some of my experiences and uses as described above will resonate more with you than others do, and that might provide some direction for you to pursue. I will say that my ideal kit in your situation would be the 25-50/2.8, the 35/1.4, and the 50/1.4.

Good luck!



May 13, 2025 at 08:02 AM
swldstn
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #9 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


I own both the 24-50/2.8 G and the 24-70/2.8 GM II but these days use them on different camera bodies based on their size. I use the 24-70/2.8 on my larger A7RV ( with a battery grip ) and the smaller 24-50/2.8 on my smaller A7CR. The 35/1.4 is heavier than the 24-50/2.8 and the 50/1.4 is between the two

Again I use the 35/1.4 on the larger system and if I really want to go small the 40/2.5 G on the A7CR.
They are all great lenses and easy to resell if you end up thinking you made the wrong decision.
Good luck.



May 13, 2025 at 09:38 AM
moby59
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


My take on this: 50mm is better because it eliminates a lot of the background. And when you have kids, the background is always a total mess. You don't want drying clothes in your frame, nor a mess of toys, or papers or flashy kid utensils or... you get the idea.

Don't get me wrong, I really like 35mm (I have the GM) but when I'm indoor with my kids, the 50 is king.

Outside it often matters less, or I can use a 2.8 zoom lens and still have a nice background.



May 14, 2025 at 09:57 AM
blnmen57
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #11 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


I personally prefer the first-class Sony FE 24/1.4 GM + the first-class Sony FE 35/1.4 GM + the super APS-C mode on my excellent Sony A7RV in this area.


May 14, 2025 at 11:08 AM
cleeezzz
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #12 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


I have the 35GM and it is perfect for challenging indoor lighting. I find taking pictures of kids includes a lot of indoor activities where space can be limited so I chose the 35 and have not regretted it.


May 17, 2025 at 06:21 PM
milend
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #13 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


There’s a $900 discount on the 35GM (new), so I couldn’t help myself and ordered one. I’ll report back once I’ve had a chance to use it a bit.


Aug 25, 2025 at 11:23 AM
Walter K
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


My favorite was always a 40mm - so at the end i bought the GM 28-70mm F2.0 - now have everything with F2.0 + do not have to change lenses so often... perfect for traveling!


Aug 25, 2025 at 03:09 PM
KarmaKramer
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #15 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


With a 35mm you can always get closer but with a 50mm you may not always be able to back up.


Aug 26, 2025 at 06:21 AM
Steve Spencer
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #16 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


Walter K wrote:
My favorite was always a 40mm - so at the end i bought the GM 28-70mm F2.0 - now have everything with F2.0 + do not have to change lenses so often... perfect for traveling!


Wow, you and I have very different idea about what we like to take for traveling. I would never consider a 918g lens perfect for traveling, but to each their own. My whole travel kit with 4 lenses weighs less than that lens plus a Sony A7r V and covers a range from 15mm to 75mm with 4 lenses.



Aug 26, 2025 at 06:36 AM
nepali
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #17 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


Steve Spencer wrote:
Wow, you and I have very different idea about what we like to take for traveling. I would never consider a 918g lens perfect for traveling, but to each their own. My whole travel kit with 4 lenses weighs less than that lens plus a Sony A7r V and covers a range from 15mm to 75mm with 4 lenses.


What four lenses do you have that weigh less than 918g in total?



Aug 26, 2025 at 08:23 AM
Steve Spencer
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #18 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


nepali wrote:
What four lenses do you have that weigh less than 918g in total?


Ah, the four lenses don't and I am planning a Fuji APS-C kit for travel just to keep it light. The four lenses aren't under 918g, but they aren't much more. They are the Sigma 10-18 f/2.8 DC (250g), the Voigtlander 23 f/1.2 (219g), the Voigtlander 35 f/2 APO macro (265g), and the Voigtlander 50 f/1.2 (290g). Together they weigh 1,024g and with the Fuji XT-5 weigh 1,581g. That is about 65g less than an A7r V and a 28-70 f/2 which comes in at 1641g, and my kit has very good ultra wide coverage and excellent 1:2 magnification close up coverage both of which are important to me, while still providing the equivalent of 35 f/1.8 and 75 f/1.8. Of course you have to like manual focus for my kit, but I am weird in that I actually prefer manual focus. I do think what travel kit one prefers is highly subjective. I wasn't criticizing the choice Walter made I just couldn't help but notice how very different it is than mine.



Aug 26, 2025 at 08:38 AM
shadow9d9
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #19 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


Meanwhile, my current perfect travel lens is the 50-150 f2. Been traveling with it, the 12-24 gm, 28-70 f2, 100 stf, and 8-16 fisheye for the last 2 months. All abroad.

Steve Spencer wrote:
Wow, you and I have very different idea about what we like to take for traveling. I would never consider a 918g lens perfect for traveling, but to each their own. My whole travel kit with 4 lenses weighs less than that lens plus a Sony A7r V and covers a range from 15mm to 75mm with 4 lenses.




Aug 26, 2025 at 01:41 PM
aCuria
Online
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #20 · Sony 35mm F1.4 GM vs Sony 50mm F1.4 GM


milend wrote:
I think I've narrowed my choice down to 35GM vs the 24-50.

With the 35GM, I basically get 35mm F1.4 and 50mm F2 (at 1/2 the resolution). With the 24-50mm, I get the 24-35mm focal range which I cannot get with the 35mm.

I just don't know how often I'd need to go below 35mm vs how often I'd need F1.4 or whether F2.8 would be sufficient (if I'm willing to ignore the DoF and two more stops of noise).


To answer you question directly, if f/2.8 means using ISO 400 instead of 100 then the zoom is fine. However if you are at ISO 12,800 with f/2.8 then use the f/1.4 prime.

f/1.4 and faster primes are their own thing, they serve a different purpose from zooms. I will choose my zooms without considering what primes I have at all. they are different things. If you’re choosing between the two, you might be approaching the question from the wrong angle.


  1. 16-35/2.8L -> 16-35/4G
  2. 24/2.8 -> 24GM
  3. 35/1.4L -> 35GM
  4. 50/1.8 -> 55ZA -> sold it
  5. 70-200L -> 70-200GMii


These are the lenses I use for photographing kids. Most of the time, I only take one lens with me, but the 70-200 is the exception, since I usually pair it with a wider lens.

A 16mm zoom is very important for videos (due to 16:9 & active stabilization crop), group photos, and shots in tight spaces. For example at an airshow if your kid is sitting in the cockpit you need 16mm. When getting on a plane I will have the 16-35 mounted. I do wish Sony had a 14-35mm zoom like Canon, but the Canon variant is not as sharp and considerably heavier.

I don't find a 24-xx lens as useful. I do have experience with the 24-70GMii and 24-105L... But for kid photography I would use a 16-35.

24GM is good for subject isolation when shooting videos, and low light environmental portraits. The 0.17x magnification is not the best but its good enough at 24mm because you would be physically really up in someone's face before running into trouble.

35GM: In most low light situations the 35GM would be my first pick. Its 0.23x magnification means you can get a kids head (10cm) tightly in frame without issues. This means zero problems with being "too close to focus" on this lens.

55ZA was sold because I can get 55/2 equivalent with 35GM in apsc mode. 35GM so sharp that you cant tell a difference doing this.

The 55ZA (0.14x), 50 mm f/1.2 GM (0.17x), 50 mm f/1.4 GM (0.16x), and 85 mm f/1.4 GM II (0.11x) all have relatively low magnification. For example, if you’re trying to take a head-and-shoulders photo of a child with a head about 10 cm wide, you’ll run into problems. At 0.16x magnification, you can only frame down to roughly 15 cm, and at 0.11x magnification you can only frame down to 22cm.

When the kids get older you want a medium telephoto for those kids concert / recitals and sports photos. Something like the 70-200 GMii. The maximum magnification is excellent (0.3x @ 70mm = 8cm subject size, 0.25x @ 200mm)

The 50-150 may be an interesting alternative. However after spending a whole bunch of extra money for the 50-150, I will lose OSS and my kit will become heavier. Its a glass half full kind of thing. Magnification (0.2x = 12cm subject size) is not as good as the 70-200GMii but its still acceptable.



Aug 28, 2025 at 02:05 AM
1              3       end




FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account