p.2 #2 · Sony 16-35mm f2.8 GM2 or Canon RF 15-35mm f2.8?
Well, as someone noted above....see if the 16-25/2.8 G comes to fruition over the next few months. If you have an impending trip, maybe rent. Seems like a 16-25 would pair extremely well with both your 28-76 or 28-200.
One thing I've learned, don't be impatient and try to solve a problem that isn't an impending problem. Meaning if you're not traveling for a while, just wait a little bit. The whole equation can change with just one lens announcement.
snegron7 wrote:
At this point for me I'm going to have to live with a compromise regardless of whatever choice I go with.
I don't have the exact numbers, but the last trip I was on I took my A7c, Viltrox AF 16mm f1.8, Tamron 20-40mm f2.8, and Tamron 28-200mm f2.8/5.6. (plus the Ricoh GRIII). Weight-wise is was prety hefty. Only one body with one lens attatched hung around my neck while the rest of the equipment was carried in a bag.
If I go with an RF 15-35mm f2.8L on my R6, I think will weigh less than what I took with me on my last trip (A7c with 3 lenses). Granted, I haven't mentioned much about my short telephoto option; with my A7c it's my Tamron 28-200mm, with my R6 it would be my old EF 85mm f1.8 USM lens with EF/RF adapter.
My ideal setup is impossible with the current options available in either system, so I know I have to settle for some sort of compromise. While the A7c is the perfect travel camera, unfortunately larger/faster lenses take away its compact advantage. ...Show more →
