fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       4       5       end
  

Archive 2023 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8

  
 
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


I'm looking for some tips to maximize accuracy using EyeAF with the Z8, especially on shallow depth of field portraits. I am no stranger to the EyeAF algorithms of mirrorless cameras. I shot Sony for many years, and their EyeAF became quite good, though not entirely perfect. I shot Canon for several years recently, with the R5 and R8, and there, the EyeAF was essentially flawless. I could rely on the camera absolutely nailing focus on the eyeball with near 100% accuracy, even with ultra-fast lenses and very shallow depth of field. I shot an event for two hours with the 50/1.2L and 85/1.2L on the R5, shooting about half the images wide open, and I think I missed focus on 3 shots total in the entire event, and that was with people milling about, not posing, etc.

I've recently transitioned to Nikon Z (though I still have my R8 and my portrait primes for the moment), and picked up a Z8. Overall, I really like the Z system, and the quality of the files is incredible on both the Z7 II and the Z8 (perhaps the best of any cameras I've ever owned), and I love the lens lineup.

However, I'm struggling with EyeAF even on the Z8, for portraiture with shallow depth of field. The system seems to have a VERY strong preference for the eyebrows or lower lashes as opposed to the iris, but it's inconsistent in that regard. I've tried using AF-S, AF-C, 3D tracking with subject recognition, wide area and spot area tracking, and while it grabs the eye visually quickly, surely and confidently, ultimately, about half my images are consistently missing critical focus, and instead jumping forward to the eyebrow. For instance, I picked up a 105mm f/1.4 to rent and try out, and in single shot or AF-C with a normal focus point, it is consistently accurate and sharp, and I have no issues. Turn on subject detection, though, and the behavior I've described happens. I did some quick portraits with my son this afternoon (he was less than thrilled to be the model), to test out the lens, and I had it set to wide area tracking with people detection, AF-C shooting at f/1.4. I took 12 shots with him leaning against a fence, with me moving forward and backwards sometimes between shots a little, but always shooting from a stable, static position. Below are crops on the focused near eye for all 12 shots...as you can see, only 6 of the 12 are what I would consider in perfect focus. 2 more are close, but not quite there and the other 4 are quite clearly focused forward of the eye, mostly on the eyebrow.

https://www.jordansteele.com/2023/EyeAF.jpg

So, that's a perfect hit rate of just 50% on a static subject, and I have to say it's a bit frustrating. I know this is very shallow depth of field, but this situation would result in essentially perfect focus every time with my RF 85L and the R8, even at f/1.2. Equally frustrating are the four full body shots I took, that still grabbed the eye in the EVF, but every single one was focused in front of him to varying degrees. I know the lens can focus accurately at these distances because all non-EyeAF shots at various distances are always dead-on. Do you have any tips with this AF system to increase the accuracy in these situations. I can use single small point AF, and that seems to work better, but of course isn't using Eye tracking at all, and is not realiable for quick changes in position, such as may be needed for events or candids.

Note also that I have similar experiences with native Z lenses like the 85/1.8S and 50/1.8S. I'm just hoping there's something I'm doing wrong, or a setting I can change that will improve things.

Btw, here's the full shot of one that nailed focus:
https://www.jordansteele.com/2023/x_fence.jpg



Aug 10, 2023 at 01:44 PM
ilkka_nissila
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


I think the shutter speed is low and a faster speed is likely to improve sharpness (in some case it is difficult to distinguish between blur due to misfocus and due to subject vs. camera motion). I would try again at 1/400s or faster and see if that improves the results. 1/125s is way too slow.

Since the camera's phase-detection sensors detect vertical lines in horizontal orientation and horizontal lines when the camera is in vertical orientation, eyebrows are prone to be picked by those sensors. However, I do not see this as a significant issue in the finished picture. To improve this and other similar issues, I would hope Nikon implements cross-type sensors. Priotitising contrast detection and more precise identification of the iris may help but I expect PDAF to handle approaching subjects better. Adapted lenses are likely to work better based on PDAF rather than CDAF data as the focus system on those lenses was developed for PDAF.


Jman13 wrote:
So, I am no stranger to the EyeAF algorithms of mirrorless cameras. I shot Sony for many years, and their EyeAF became quite good, though not entirely perfect. I shot Canon for several years recently, with the R5 and R8, and there, the EyeAF was essentially flawless. I could rely on the camera absolutely nailing focus on the eyeball with near 100% accuracy, even with ultra-fast lenses and very shallow depth of field. I shot an event for two hours with the 50/1.2L and 85/1.2L on the R5, shooting about half the images wide open, and I think I missed
...Show more



Aug 10, 2023 at 02:01 PM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


I'm not buying the shutter speed thing...this has IBIS on, and I can hand hold this lens at 1/15s and get sharp shots. (not to mention that the full body shots that all missed were at 1/1000s). I've also had the same issue when shooting with flash, where shutter speed is irrelevant due to the very short duration of the flash burst. There are one or two shots here that might have a hint of motion blur, but the issue is where the focus plane is...on the out of focus shots it's forward of the iris.

For example, here's a shot from last night with the 105/1.4, and despite the focus box staying stuck to his eye consistently, here's the final output. This is with bounced flash, so no worries about shutter speed here:

https://www.jordansteele.com/2023/x_close.jpg

100% crop:
https://www.jordansteele.com/2023/x_close_crop.jpg

And an example with a slightly different framing, but all three are the same framing, and horizontal - 3 shots taken in quick succession....one in perfect focus, one out of focus, but not too far out, and one very out of focus.
https://www.jordansteele.com/2023/EyeAF2.jpg




Aug 10, 2023 at 02:12 PM
RoamingScott
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


Which IBIS mode? I'd suggest sport for AF-C and bursts.


Aug 10, 2023 at 02:19 PM
bcaslis
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


I have to honest, I've seen this behavior on the Z7II, Z9, and now Z8. I wish I could point to something that makes the difference but I have never been able to determine this. I had an R5 for a while and it always was spot on.


Aug 10, 2023 at 02:20 PM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


RoamingScott wrote:
Which IBIS mode? I'd suggest sport for AF-C and bursts.


I had it on normal, but how would that affect focus plane?



Aug 10, 2023 at 02:23 PM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #7 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


bcaslis wrote:
I have to honest, I've seen this behavior on the Z7II, Z9, and now Z8. I wish I could point to something that makes the difference but I have never been able to determine this. I had an R5 for a while and it always was spot on.


That's what I'm afraid of. It's honestly the only thing I don't like about my Nikon bodies so far. And overall, portraiture is a fairly small portion of what I shoot, so for most things I have no issues whatsoever, but I do shoot the occasional event here and there, and I'm dreading having like 40% of my shots out of focus.



Aug 10, 2023 at 02:29 PM
bcaslis
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


Unless you are tracking something, IBIS mode on sport should make no difference (horizontal motion). I normally use IBIS normal, AFC, and single shot.


Aug 10, 2023 at 02:31 PM
bcaslis
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


Jman13 wrote:
That's what I'm afraid of. It's honestly the only thing I don't like about my Nikon bodies so far. And overall, portraiture is a fairly small portion of what I shoot, so for most things I have no issues whatsoever, but I do shoot the occasional event here and there, and I'm dreading having like 40% of my shots out of focus.


I normally get much better than 40%, but a stray hair for example can district it (eyebrow, hair on a cat, etc...). I would love a secret formula to fix this but I have not found.



Aug 10, 2023 at 02:34 PM
ilkka_nissila
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


The issue seems to be principally that the camera identifies a larger area than just the iris as the "eye" and so you end up with some variability in focus as to which part of this area the camera focuses on. The exact position of the phase-detection rows relative to the subject features also can affect the outcome.

I see maybe 3 / 1000 of shots out of focus at events so far with the Z8. I typically shoot most things wide open at f/2.8 or f/1.8, but in many cases there are multiple people in the frame and to get them adequately ik tmmn the depth of field, I need to stop down the lens. With wide angles, f/4 is typically a good compromise or if a formal image, f/5.6.

Now, if using a fast tele wide open for images of individual people, you can expect some problems with eyebrows and eyelashes. But generally one should ask how are the benefits and drawbacks of different apertures for those shots. Stopping down to (say) f/3.5 might be a good idea to get adequate depth of field across the face.

Also consider at what size the images will be displayed and whether those differences in focus truly matter.



Jman13 wrote:
That's what I'm afraid of. It's honestly the only thing I don't like about my Nikon bodies so far. And overall, portraiture is a fairly small portion of what I shoot, so for most things I have no issues whatsoever, but I do shoot the occasional event here and there, and I'm dreading having like 40% of my shots out of focus.




Aug 10, 2023 at 03:38 PM
RoamingScott
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


I've never been particularly impressed with Nikon's subject tracking in any situation, but shooting something like 105mm at 1.4 requires some finesse and often more finesse than slapping it in AF-C + Tracking and popping shots.

As you found, single shot and a defined AF point works better, and would typically be my default strategy when shooting a razor thin DOF. If you're at F4 for groups, then tracking won't really let you down.



Aug 10, 2023 at 03:44 PM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #12 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


RoamingScott wrote:
I've never been particularly impressed with Nikon's subject tracking in any situation, but shooting something like 105mm at 1.4 requires some finesse and often more finesse than slapping it in AF-C + Tracking and popping shots.

As you found, single shot and a defined AF point works better, and would typically be my default strategy when shooting a razor thin DOF. If you're at F4 for groups, then tracking won't really let you down.


I understand a lot of that, except I have been shooting this way with Canon for three years with an 85/1.2 and 50/1.2 and absolutely nailing focus time and time and time again. I think I will likely have to modify my strategy as you say when I’m in these situations, but it’s a bummer that my $4000 Nikon can’t do what my $1500 Canon can.



Aug 10, 2023 at 03:56 PM
RoamingScott
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


Well your $4000 Nikon can do a hell of a lot MORE than your $1500 Canon can, at least


Aug 10, 2023 at 04:08 PM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #14 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8




RoamingScott wrote:
Well your $4000 Nikon can do a hell of a lot MORE than your $1500 Canon can, at least


Yes, there are certainly several areas where it is quite a bit better, which is why I was drawn to it. Overall, I’m still very happy with the camera, but I do hope Nikon can tweak the EyeAF algorithms via firmware to make the Z8 all it can be.



Aug 10, 2023 at 04:30 PM
suteetat
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


Not really sure what happened but on my z9, z8 shooting a couple of events recently non professionally with 85/1.2s, eye focus has been pretty much flawless. Comparingto my friend’s R5, may be R5 will lock on a face and eye at longer distance than z7ii and Z9 but Z8 is also better than z9 in that respect. However I have not compare Z8 to R5 recently.
For portraiture, i tend to use afs, ibis on if the subject is not moving much. Ss around 1/150-1/250 although for stationary subject, ss can be much lower.
I dont think eye focus would pick eye brown over eye as the algorithm is looking for round thing. Sometimes as a subject turns its face, eye focus went to a round ear instead of eye as I found out recently shooting some primates. Once in awhile eye focus pick out something rounder but larger than human eye in the scene instead. I think eye detection probably work fine but something happen and focus plane was slightly shifted.



Aug 10, 2023 at 05:26 PM
barnettg
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


Hello,

Although I'm using a low end Z5, I do not get eyebrows or lower lashes focusing issues. However, I have a couple of tips that might or might not help.

Having owned the Z5 since last year and the Nikon Picture Control (Standard, Portrait, etc) seemed to have made the difference in eye AF because from what I have read, the AF is read off the EVF, rather than from the sensor directly, Thom has mentioned that on his site although I don't know if it also applies to the Z8 or Z9.

For this, I choose Standard (or Auto) for stronger contrast so that eye AF would focus better on the eyes. When it comes to post processing using NX Studio, I simply switch to Portrait in RAW.

Also I turned off 'Apply Settings to Live View' to improve the AF tracking in my case, although maybe not neccessary for 2nd generation (Z6 II/Z7 II). Worth a shot anyway



Aug 11, 2023 at 04:48 AM
Steve Spencer
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #17 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


Let me offer a perspective that is perhaps sacrilege here. I think there can be too much emphasis on focus on the iris. For me when I take a portrait I want not only the iris to be in focus but the tip of the nose as well. That means that the depth of field needs to be at least an inch and with some people 2 inches and these shots have a lot less depth of field than that at least with the sort of magnification presented, which is of course a lot more magnification than would ever make sense for a full image. This is the sort of magnification for an 8 X 10 or 12 X 15 print where you would be putting your face right up next to the print. I think for prints of this size 11 of the 12 shots would have the Iris in focus from a reasonable viewing distance. Still for my tastes the depth of field may be too shallow and I doubt the tip of the nose would be in focus even with reasonable print sizes and reasonable viewing distances. It seems to me that from this distance any reasonable portrait would need a narrower aperture something like f/1.8, f/2, or maybe even f/2.8. Would the iris be in focus with this wider depth of field? I think all these images would be fine for focus with such a wider depth of field for my tastes and I think the solution here is simple. For such shots stop down a bit.

Why does this matter? Because I am not sure that with really shallow depth of field I want the plane of focus to be right at the iris. Some of these shots with the plane of focus just in front of the iris may well turn out better as the tip of the nose might fall more within focus and the whole of the face will have better focus, for my tastes at least. I am just not sure that the focus on the Iris being in focus from extreme magnification is the best way to judge a portrait. I suspect it is not, for my tastes at least.

This is not to say that there are no advantages to a fast lens as in this case if Jordan took one step back, the depth of field would increase a lot and f/1.4 would likely work well and there would be no issues with the Z8's eye AF.

Nor is it to say that Nikon's system isn't a bit behind, say Canon's system. I think the issue isn't accuracy, however, but precision which is always something to consider with any system or instrument. How precise does it need to be? My bathroom scale, for example, seems only to be precise to about a pound. I can step on the scale repeated times and get pretty different numbers. I fine with that as I don't need a really precise measurement of my weight. Weight naturally fluctuates anyway, so precision isn't essential. For the Z8, eye AF seems to be precise to about 1/4 of an inch, which for me would work fine in pretty much all of my photography because I don't need the extreme magnification that Jordan is showing here and would want portraits with more depth of field and more depth of field means less precision is needed. Canon in contrast from Jordan's experience seems to have precision to something like 1/64 of an inch. There is nothing wrong with that and I would take it if there were no other tradeoffs, but for me I just don't value that extra precision as it would very rarely be useful to me. Just like I don't value a bathroom scale that would be precise to the once as that sort of precision I would never find useful.

We can and should differ on how much precision we want in an AF system. Precision is a good thing but precision also always reaches a point where additional precision adds very little. For me the additional precision of the Canon system's eye AF, adds very little for my type of portraiture over the Z8 system's eye AF. Of course other people's MMV.




Aug 11, 2023 at 08:25 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


I agree with you, Steve, to some extent. The shots of my son that are very close up are not normally what I would choose to shoot regarding depth of field, because it is far too shallow there, but it is useful for testing. You may be correct on precision, and ultimately, it may not matter too much in many use cases, but even a bit further away, if it misses, it can decrease the apparent subject sharpness. The 3/4 portrait outside is something I very much like the ultra-shallow DOF there, as the face is generally in focus enough, with eyes sharp, and then lovely falloff to the background (and on the 105/1.4, it is quite beautiful to my eyes). I have had a few shots also, though where it misses even at f/2.8 or smaller, and while the DOF covers the eyes to some extent, you end up with a super sharp eyebrow and then slightly less sharp eyes, and it still draws attention to the wrong spot. For studio portraits, it's much less of a concern, as I'm usually shooting at f/8 or f/11 to get the whole face in focus.

Still, for me, a lot of it is about confidence. With my Canon gear, I could compose how I wanted, and not worry about focus more or less at all, and I would KNOW that the shot was going to be perfectly focused, every time. Now, it's a little less sure. (this is for portraits only...for other stuff, including animal Eye AF for some reason, I've found focus to be exceptionally accurate and reliable on the Z8, and even on my Z7 II).

I will say the tracking AF seems to be excellent with the Z8, and shooting action where someone is more distant, and so the level of precision needed is a bit less, I'm getting very good accuracy for the most part, at least no worse than on other systems.



Aug 11, 2023 at 09:00 AM
ilkka_nissila
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8


I agree with you that in general for a portrait you want more than just the iris in focus.

As for precision, I think the Z AF is very precise in setting the correct distance and that's not where the issue is, but simply that it considers a larger area of the image as the eye and non only the iris. I think Nikon will likely improve this over time. The OP notes that when not using subject detection the focus is fine, so the precision of the AF system (in setting focus distance) should not be what is causing the issue. I think it has to do with where the phase-detect sensors reside (laterally) relative to the eye. Canon has thousands of PDAF sensors (in fact millions because each pixel corresponds to a PDAF unit) and so it is more precise in identifying and focusing on a small target like the eye. This allows Canons to detect and focus on the eye at longer distances where it constitutes a smaller part of the frame. So there is more precision in the lateral dimensions and more scalability. But it is still possible to get excellent results consistently with Nikons. It may require a bit more from the user, however, in some fringe cases.


Steve Spencer wrote:
Let me offer a perspective that is perhaps sacrilege here. I think there can be too much emphasis on focus on the iris. For me when I take a portrait I want not only the iris to be in focus but the tip of the nose as well. That means that the depth of field needs to be at least an inch and with some people 2 inches and these shots have a lot less depth of field than that at least with the sort of magnification presented, which is of course a lot more magnification than would ever
...Show more



Aug 11, 2023 at 09:07 AM
JHut
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · Tips for consistent EyeAF with Z8



What is the focus (subject) distance for these shots? Wide Area Mode w/ people subject detection? Custom focus box size? Hand off to 3D? If a specific very thin DOF is the goal here then maybe pinpoint AF on the pupil? The 105mm at f/1.4 and a subject 5 ft away then your DOF will be only 1/4". Move back from you subject to 10 ft or use f/5.6 and your DOF will improve to 1".



Aug 11, 2023 at 09:41 AM
       2       3       4       5       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       4       5       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account