Archive 2023 · R7 for general bird photography: my take

Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #1 · R7 for general bird photography: my take

George Welch wrote:
Hi Tony,

Thanks for the comment. That would be the case with the R5. I don't use ES for that because it is only silent and hard to tell how many exposures you are making.

Why do you care how many exposures you are making? If it is because of file size, then why not shoot in C-RAW?

https://www.headshotmethod.com/blog/canon-r5-resolution-vs-file-size#:~:text=If%20you%20have%20the%20R5,R5%20set%20to%20C%2DRAW.

For the R7, I only showed one shot of the burst, and all were affected.

That is a simple fix - R6 II.

Sep 02, 2023 at 01:20 PM

George Welch
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #2 · R7 for general bird photography: my take

That is a simple fix - R6 II.

😂 Tony, knew that would be your reply.

George

Sep 02, 2023 at 07:31 PM

EB-1
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.2 #3 · R7 for general bird photography: my take

George Welch wrote:

😂 Tony, knew that would be your reply.

George

You need almost 2x the focal length on the low-res R6 II sensor (1.87x) or you need to be twice as close to the species.
Otherwise you are getting only 9MP in the field of view of the 32MP R7.

EBH

Sep 02, 2023 at 08:21 PM

Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.2 #4 · R7 for general bird photography: my take

EB-1 wrote:
You need almost 2x the focal length on the low-res R6 II sensor (1.87x) or you need to be twice as close to the species.
Otherwise you are getting only 9MP in the field of view of the 32MP R7.

EBH

No kidding? Only we (George & I) were referring to rolling-shutter effect of R7 compared to R6 II.

Sep 02, 2023 at 09:49 PM

1 2 end
FM Forums \| Canon Forum \| Join Upload & Sell 1 2 end