molson wrote:
You said I posted information that you said you had to correct - even though when I posted it, you agreed with me... you don't even seem to know what you're arguing about, so I can see why you're confused... I guess the best thing to do is hide you so this thread starts to make sense again.
At least your photos are good, your logic is hilarious.
I think the 150-400 was a little too long for use at Timbavati Private Reserve, as the vehicles can usually go right next to the animals. Ended up with mostly nead shots... Hahaha. A second body with the 40-150mm f2.8, might have been the most optimal setup. I bring along the Sony A1 with the Tamron 35-150mm f2-2.8, but it was handled by my son, whose not really into photography. Still trying to see what images I can get from that camera.
RSK01 wrote:
I think the 150-400 was a little too long for use at Timbavati Private Reserve, as the vehicles can usually go right next to the animals. Ended up with mostly nead shots... Hahaha. A second body with the 40-150mm f2.8, might have been the most optimal setup. I bring along the Sony A1 with the Tamron 35-150mm f2-2.8, but it was handled by my son, whose not really into photography. Still trying to see what images I can get from that camera.
