fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              19              21              36       37       end
  

Archive 2021 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!

  
 
realVivek
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #1 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


Visible starts (by most accepted conventions) at 400nm. 410 is visible violet.

Here is the transmission spectrum I promised earlier.

OOscr1 by Vivek Iyer, on Flickr

As you can notice, there is virtually no difference between the Kenko Zeta L41 filter and the UV/IR cut stack of A7rII.

tsdevine wrote:
.. which has a hard cut around 410nm (which by my understanding is within the visible spectrum, I guess you could call it near UV spectrum.)







Mar 10, 2021 at 01:12 PM
tsdevine
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #2 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!



Thanks, that's interesting, yet I see a visible difference with filter and without.

realVivek wrote:
Visible starts (by most accepted conventions) at 400nm. 410 is visible violet.

Here is the transmission spectrum I promised earlier.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51018912382_5b84b08ca8_o.jpgOOscr1 by Vivek Iyer, on Flickr

As you can notice, there is virtually no difference between the Kenko Zeta L41 filter and the UV/IR cut stack of A7rII.






Mar 10, 2021 at 02:24 PM
inksandpaper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #3 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


realVivek wrote:
Visible starts (by most accepted conventions) at 400nm. 410 is visible violet.

Here is the transmission spectrum I promised earlier.
.. which has a hard cut around 410nm (which by my understanding is within the visible spectrum, I guess you could call it near UV spectrum.)



Thanks for the information @realVivek! Do you happen to know if the UV cut filter for this Sony you measured is based on absorptive or interference coatings?

BTW I have not noticed any magenta shift off-axis on any of my lenses, no matter how I looked, with or without diffuser (similar to expodisc) filter, with or without UV filter in front of the lens, in all kinds of low and high UV sky exposures, even when deliberately testing and trying to look for it, with or without camera "Lens Comp. Shading" on and off, with the same lens that @tsdevine uses. But I can easily notice it in his samples and the new Cosina samples of the new 35mm. This is quite disturbing.

I am trying to understand how it might work. If the UV filter on the sensor is the interference type, the effectiveness is usually tuned to be maximal when the incident ray angle is orthogonal to the filter surface, and the effect is diminished as the ray angle becomes more oblique, which it will off axis, when the exit pupil is nearer to the focal plane, such as with wide angles of non-telecentric design. The BSI sensors of newer Sonys are greatly resistant to lens/sensor cast from oblique exit ray angles but it does not help when the sensor filter stack is transmitting light of a different colour. As the incident angle to the filter becomes more oblique, interference coatings become less effective and the reflected light colour shifts towards the longer wavelengths, i.e. reflected UV becomes reflecting more blue and more cyan light, and thus the transmitted light, having been filtered of that colour, becomes shifted to the opposite colour, which is more reddish or magenta. That's the magenta shift that has been noted.

I suspect this is the true nature of what is happening, though I've not yet seen any other explanation like mine. This is predicated of course, on the assumption that the UV filter is indeed using interference-based coatings. I happen to know, with good authority, that the IR filters (there are two), on the other hand, are using both absorptive and interference-based coatings. The interference-based IR filter should shift to longer wavelengths of reflected light also as the ray angle gets more oblique, which means more red (and far IR) light gets reflected, and thus more blue light is transmitted. Hot filters typically have a bluish reflection tint on the external surface, and reddish reflection tint on the inside surface, I gather. I don't use these filters and have only researched them online.

The effects seem to mostly offset each other in my tests, since I see that the colour distribution from on to off-axis is mostly very neutral, and if anything, the shift has been 1 or two points towards blue/cyan, rather than red/magenta. Interference coatings are difficult to apply consistently, and in all likelihood, the effectiveness of each do not balance each other out perfectly for some batches of filters. It may be that some batches of cameras are more susceptible to colour shift as a result. I honestly don't know if that's really the case. Others more intelligent than I might be able to offer a better guess.

Edited on Mar 10, 2021 at 08:00 PM · View previous versions



Mar 10, 2021 at 07:49 PM
tsdevine
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #4 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!



That theory would make sense, it would also explain why the UV filter helps.

-Tim



Mar 10, 2021 at 07:59 PM
Maximilian
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #5 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


Where do you find those T&Y Foto L41 filters? I'd like to give them a try but I can't find them anywhere.


Mar 10, 2021 at 08:56 PM
formula4speed
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #6 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


I mean this in the nicest way possible. You guys are nerds


Mar 10, 2021 at 09:14 PM
tsdevine
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #7 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


Similar thing happens with my a7R II BTW. I guess be happy that you don't see this behavior when using your copy on your cameras.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vn6e7pcvrcl40gc/AAAHTopu9dk-d4M5lldYUnSaa?dl=0

-Tim

inksandpaper wrote:
Thanks for the information @realVivek@! Do you happen to know if the UV cut filter for this Sony you measured is based on absorptive or interference coatings?

BTW I have not noticed any magenta shift off-axis on any of my lenses, no matter how I looked, with or without diffuser (similar to expodisc) filter, with or without UV filter in front of the lens, in all kinds of low and high UV sky exposures, even when deliberately testing and trying to look for it, with or without camera "Lens Comp. Shading" on and off, with the same lens that @tsdevine@ uses.
...Show more




Mar 10, 2021 at 09:35 PM
realVivek
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #8 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


formula4speed wrote:
I mean this in the nicest way possible. You guys are nerds


A bit of misplaced priorities for sure.




Mar 11, 2021 at 03:20 AM
realVivek
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #9 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


Hi, Thanks.

What Tim found and provided the solution with (using an UV cut filter) is quite right. Also, one of his observations that it depends on the conditions is also correct. Please do not take this the wrong way (I know Singaporeans are very sensitive) but there may not be sufficient UV in your air due to ground pollution whereas where Tim lives perhaps has very clean air, especially during the COVID-19 times. Paris (France) at ground level there isn’t much UV.

The UV/IR cut stacks in FF Sony cameras have both absorptive and refractive filters.

Take a look at this experiment. Shots of the filter stacks in UV and Visible light. No UV gets through even at angles. BTW, although Cosina have not published it, the exit pupil in AL 50/2 is likely very large.

Filter-stack by Vivek Iyer, on Flickr

Visible: Sony A7 (full spectrum), UV/IR cut filter on UV-Planar 60/4
UV: Sony A7 (full spectrum), Baader U 2” bandpass filter (320-390nm) on UV Planar 60/4



inksandpaper wrote:
Thanks for the information @realVivek@! Do you happen to know if the UV cut filter for this Sony you measured is based on absorptive or interference coatings?

BTW I have not noticed any magenta shift off-axis on any of my lenses, no matter how I looked, with or without diffuser (similar to expodisc) filter, with or without UV filter in front of the lens, in all kinds of low and high UV sky exposures, even when deliberately testing and trying to look for it, with or without camera "Lens Comp. Shading" on and off, with the same lens that @tsdevine@ uses.
...Show more




Mar 11, 2021 at 03:33 AM
realVivek
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #10 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


They are on eBay. For you (from Germany), best to look at aliexpress. They are more like 420nm cut. It appears Kenko Zeta L41 are discontinued, unfortunately.

Maximilian wrote:
Where do you find those T&Y Foto L41 filters? I'd like to give them a try but I can't find them anywhere.





Mar 11, 2021 at 03:37 AM
inksandpaper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #11 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


realVivek wrote:
Hi, Thanks.

What Tim found and provided the solution with (using an UV cut filter) is quite right. Also, one of his observations that it depends on the conditions is also correct. Please do not take this the wrong way (I know Singaporeans are very sensitive) but there may not be sufficient UV in your air due to ground pollution whereas where Tim lives perhaps has very clean air, especially during the COVID-19 times. Paris (France) at ground level there isn’t much UV.

The UV/IR cut stacks in FF Sony cameras have both absorptive and refractive filters.

Take a look at this
...Show more

Thank you for the additional details, very nice to see the effects of the filters like that. I do see that there is a bright spot in the UV image for the a7R II stack, so certainly not all light is being blocked. It's hard to see the light angles in this example. Straight on vs oblique light incidence and transmission is not clear at all to me from this experiment. We should only expect to see a very subtle change - Tim's images show fairly subtle but noticeable differences.

There is no sensitivity about this. I can simply check AQICN's data for air pollution updated by the hour. Our air (and Paris's) right now are pretty clean, and in fact we have been given a warning for extreme UV radiation and advice to put on sunscreen when outdoors for the past week. I'm also seeing Pennsylvania's air right now is actually not quite as clean as ours on average.

So if you say the filter stack of the sensor lets in no UV at any angle, what's the use of having a UV cut filter to eliminate this issue? Why should the colour cast shift gradually towards magenta off-axis? Please help to illuminate!

We can quite easily derive the exit pupil distance of the AL 50/2 by looking through the lens, we don't need Cosina to tell us this specification (it's about 34mm at infinity focus).




Mar 11, 2021 at 04:31 AM
realVivek
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #12 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


The experiment was correct but a single shot will not show you the angular effects (wait for another experiment when I have time). I can even shoot video in reflected UV.

Mind you I have only been disproving some of the speculations raised.

I will not comment further on the air vs UV. It is Volkswagen territory!!


inksandpaper wrote:
Thank you for the additional details, very nice to see the effects of the filters like that. I do see that there is a bright spot in the UV image for the a7R II stack, so certainly not all light is being blocked. It's hard to see the light angles in this example. Straight on vs oblique light incidence and transmission is not clear at all to me from this experiment.





Mar 11, 2021 at 05:12 AM
inksandpaper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #13 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


@realVivek, it would be great to know what is your hypothesis for why we see this magenta cast? And why you think Cosina is at fault for this issue and how you think Cosina can fix this by changing the lens design? Thank you.


Mar 11, 2021 at 05:37 AM
realVivek
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #14 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


Those are fair and appropriate questions. I had exactly the same ones and I have notified Cosina through some channels (thank you, Fred!).

Let us hope that we get to benefit from their stellar offerings.

AFAIC, what Tim showed is correct and also the solution he provided is correct.



Mar 11, 2021 at 06:02 AM
TakenWild
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #15 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


Thanks for jumping in @realVivek.
This would explain why I get these casts bad. I live in a part of Australia with very high UV (just finished summer here) and very low pollution.

I just purchased some Kenko Zeta L41 filters last week to go along with my Zeiss UV filters. I’m preparing for the worst with the APO 35. They are half the price of the zeiss UV filters. Very nicely made filters.



Mar 11, 2021 at 06:11 AM
realVivek
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #16 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


Thanks! IMHO (supported by what I find experimentally), the Kenko Zeta L41 are worth their price and more.

I was a bit surprised to discover that the fancied Zeiss CSC filter (with a nice bright orange T* designation) does not cut the mustard (orUV) that well. It is of a complex construction and it cost me a pretty penny.



Mar 11, 2021 at 06:33 AM
tsdevine
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #17 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


And as of yesterday, I have tested the Kenko L41 UV against the Zeiss UV. They are close to indistinguishable in terms of positive impact to this phenomena. Sometimes I *think* I see the Kenko being slightly better, but we're talking so close it would be hard to really say there is a tangible difference.

And as Vivek noted, they seem to be discontinued.

Just woke up, still trying to catch up on the activity since my last night. Not enough coffee yet....

-Tim



Mar 11, 2021 at 06:56 AM
tsdevine
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #18 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!



Unfortunately Pennsylvania gets some pollution from inside the state, but a lot of it comes from surrounding states, I believe from power generation. Although I'm sure there are multiple sources contributing.

inksandpaper wrote:
Thank you for the additional details, very nice to see the effects of the filters like that. I do see that there is a bright spot in the UV image for the a7R II stack, so certainly not all light is being blocked. It's hard to see the light angles in this example. Straight on vs oblique light incidence and transmission is not clear at all to me from this experiment. We should only expect to see a very subtle change - Tim's images show fairly subtle but noticeable differences.

There is no sensitivity about this. I can simply check AQICN's
...Show more




Mar 11, 2021 at 06:59 AM
obwohl
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #19 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


Which UV filter do you recommend for the apo lanthar 50 f2 on Sony A7R4? And is there a solution to use it with the lens hood (which I really want to use all the time for contrast and protection)?


Mar 11, 2021 at 07:39 AM
tsdevine
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #20 · Official: Voigtlander 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar announced!


I haven't personally tested the a7R IV, so I don't know if it shows the same behavior. I can't remember if anyone else has chimed in who might have first hand experience.

I don't notice any vignetting when mounting the hood to the filter.

Both the Zeiss and Kenko work similarly enough from tests I have done. The Kenko is cheaper, but discontinued...the Zeiss is a lot more pricey.

FWIW,
Tim

obwohl wrote:
Which UV filter do you recommend for the apo lanthar 50 f2 on Sony A7R4? And is there a solution to use it with the lens hood (which I really want to use all the time for contrast and protection)?





Mar 11, 2021 at 07:42 AM
1       2       3              19              21              36       37       end




FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              19              21              36       37       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account