p.4 #1 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
sismailian wrote:
I just finished comparing two copies of the sigma 24-70 2.8 dg dn (one from B&H and one from samy's camera) vs two copies of the sony 24-70 2.8 GM from B&H.
Just curious, B&H will take back other lenses, no questions asked?
p.4 #2 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
Yes I sent back the sony 24-70 2.8 gm lens just said I wasn't happy with it. Took bit over a week to get the actual money back, they are kinda slow on that. Very happy I kept the sigma I got from B&H that was the better copy.
p.4 #4 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
Jordan121787 wrote:
I’m still so torn whether to get the 24-105 or the sigma 24-70. Right now I mainly shoot for a hobby but maybe one day want to do some paid work.
I am in a similar place to you. I have a nice copy of the Sony 24-105, but keep pondering the 24-70 DG DN hoping it would be an upgrade for landscape IQ.
p.4 #5 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
Rent one or buy one and compare. Return if you don't like I really do like the infinity rendering of the sigma. Never thought I'd like a zoom so much until I got to use it.
p.4 #6 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
In my humble opinion the newest Sigma 24-70 f2.8 dg DN auto focuses just as good and as fast as the Sony gmaster. I’ve had zero issues with missing a moment as a wedding photographer!!
p.4 #9 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
I had the GM for a couple years, then left Sony, when I came back I bought the Sigma. To me it's better than the GM. It's smaller, lighter and sharper. I liked the GM and used it a lot. but when I came back to Sony I wanted to try some of the new Sigma glass I heard about, including this one and the 14-24. It's as good or better for 1/2 the price, so....I'm in.
I wouldn't hesitate to tell someone that can afford either, to get the Sigma.
p.4 #12 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
If you are willing to carry around a standard 24-70/2.8 - which are heavy lenses no matter the manufacturer - I feel the Sigma won't disappoint. I don't take it out so much because of its size and limited focal length, but when I do I am never disappointed in the results.
p.4 #13 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
With a newborn on the way, I am leaving behind the world of Rx1 travel photography to get a big boy camera (thinking a7r ii or iii). Is the difference in AF actually all that significant between the Sony and the Sigma? Would be nice to save a chunk of change going with the Sigma.
p.4 #14 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
Teo Rey wrote:
My biggest concern with the Sigma lens is how much dust many people report gets inside the lens. If I'm spending $1000 on a lens, even if it's half the price of the GM I still want to know that it's durable and going to last me a long time.
That plus the current EDU sale led me to bit the bullet and see if I am fine with the size & weight difference over the Tamron is okay. I'm barely fitting it diameter wise with 3 other lenses in my current bag but may upgrade.
p.4 #18 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
A lot of love for the Sigma on this thread! I've been on the market for the Sigma for some time but have never really seen the price drop. By chance I just came across a used, good condition Sony GM for the same UK retail price as a brand new Sigma, so I just couldn't pass up the opportunity.
I'm intending to use it to replace another Sigma, the 45/2.8 (!), which I love for the handling and rendering but the AF-C/Eye AF gives me increasing grief as both my boys become increasingly mobile). I'll let you know how that works out.
p.4 #19 · Sigma 24-70 F2.8 Art vs Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM
The Sigma 24-70 is just as good, but an other good option is their 28-70, I sold my GM and got a Tamron 28-75 because I find myself using Zooms less, on problem with Sigma is they Zoom the same way as Canon, so if you have a Sony 70-200 GM or a Tamron 70-180 your lenses will be zoom the wrong way...